public-webauthn@w3.org from February 2022 by author

=JeffH

• [w3c/webauthn] 23ea3e: add Notes to RP verification steps linking to DPK ... (Friday, 18 February)

=JeffH via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] DPK attestation may create possible side channel attack on the batch key. (#1701) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarification needed regarding meaning of "user verification is required" (#1699) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663) (Friday, 18 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: [webauthn] FIDO credential decommissioning (#1696) (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Platform Errors for attestations. (#1697) (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) (Tuesday, 1 February)

Anthony Nadalin via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] FIDO dredential decommissioning (#1696) (Wednesday, 9 February)

Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Use of CBOR, and Uint8Array/ArrayBuffer (#1362) (Monday, 7 February)

David Chadwick via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Friday, 25 February)

David Waite via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 15 February)

Emil Lundberg

• [w3c/webauthn] 43aeea: Change UV check step from passive to active voice (Thursday, 24 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 24 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 24 February)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarification needed regarding meaning of "user verification is required" (#1699) (Thursday, 24 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Change UV check step from passive to active voice (Thursday, 24 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarification needed regarding meaning of "user verification is required" (#1699) (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) (Thursday, 10 February)

Firstyear via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) (Thursday, 10 February)

Gerald Oskoboiny via RT

• Re: [sysreq #15869] pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 (Thursday, 10 February)

jdenghifive via GitHub

• [webauthn] FIDO dredential decommissioning (#1696) (Wednesday, 9 February)

Jeff Hodges

• Re: [sysreq #15869] pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• FYI: Conditional UI (aka Conditional Mediation) passed TAG review (Tuesday, 1 February)

Jeff Hodges via RT

• Re: [sysreq #15869] pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 (Thursday, 10 February)
• [sysreq #15869] Re: pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 (Wednesday, 9 February)

John Bradley via GitHub

• [webauthn] DPK attestation may create possible side channel attack on the batch key. (#1701) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Errors for attestations. (#1697) (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665) (Monday, 7 February)

John Pascoe via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Can PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity.id be null? (#1702) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Can PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity.id be null? (#1702) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Can PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity.id be null? (#1702) (Wednesday, 23 February)

Lonli-Lokli via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Saturday, 5 February)

Matthew Miller

• [w3c/webauthn] 59ecbf: Add sections for new API methods (Wednesday, 23 February)

Matthew Miller via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) (Thursday, 10 February)
• [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Use of CBOR, and Uint8Array/ArrayBuffer (#1362) (Monday, 7 February)

Mike Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) (Wednesday, 2 February)

nadalin@prodigy.net

• 02/23/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Wednesday, 23 February)
• 02/09/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Wednesday, 9 February)

Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Thursday, 17 February)

Shane Weeden via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Wednesday, 23 February)

Silvan Mosberger via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Change UV check step from passive to active voice (#1704) (Thursday, 24 February)
• [webauthn] Clarification needed: Is "user verification is required" the same as the `userVerification` option being set to `required` (#1699) (Monday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) (Wednesday, 2 February)

Tim Cappalli

• Re: WebAuthn F2F @ RSA 2022 (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: WebAuthn F2F @ RSA 2022 (Wednesday, 23 February)
• WebAuthn F2F @ RSA 2022 (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] aa68ab: Bit 3 MUST NOT change and formatting fixes in list (Tuesday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0c7405: #1692 backup states in authenticator data (Tuesday, 8 February)

Tim Cappalli via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli (Tuesday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: #1692 backup states in authenticator data (Tuesday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli (Tuesday, 8 February)

W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 1 February)

Wendy Seltzer

• Re: WebAuthn F2F @ RSA 2022 (Friday, 25 February)

Last message date: Friday, 25 February 2022 10:08:14 UTC