public-webauthn@w3.org from February 2022 by date

Friday, 25 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) David Chadwick via GitHub
• Re: WebAuthn F2F @ RSA 2022 Wendy Seltzer

Thursday, 24 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Change UV check step from passive to active voice (#1704) Silvan Mosberger via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarification needed regarding meaning of "user verification is required" (#1699) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Change UV check step from passive to active voice Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 43aeea: Change UV check step from passive to active voice Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg

Wednesday, 23 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: WebAuthn F2F @ RSA 2022 Tim Cappalli
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 59ecbf: Add sections for new API methods Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: WebAuthn F2F @ RSA 2022 Tim Cappalli
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Firstyear via GitHub
• WebAuthn F2F @ RSA 2022 Tim Cappalli
• Re: [webauthn] DPK attestation may create possible side channel attack on the batch key. (#1701) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) Mike Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Can PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity.id be null? (#1702) John Pascoe via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Can PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity.id be null? (#1702) John Pascoe via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) Mike Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] Can PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity.id be null? (#1702) John Pascoe via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarification needed regarding meaning of "user verification is required" (#1699) =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] DPK attestation may create possible side channel attack on the batch key. (#1701) John Bradley via GitHub
• 02/23/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net

Tuesday, 22 February 2022

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Friday, 18 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663) =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 23ea3e: add Notes to RP verification steps linking to DPK ... =JeffH
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub

Thursday, 17 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

Tuesday, 15 February 2022

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub

Monday, 14 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Clarification needed regarding meaning of "user verification is required" (#1699) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] Clarification needed: Is "user verification is required" the same as the `userVerification` option being set to `required` (#1699) Silvan Mosberger via GitHub

Friday, 11 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) Matthew Miller via GitHub

Thursday, 10 February 2022

• Re: [sysreq #15869] pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 Jeff Hodges via RT
• Re: [sysreq #15869] pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 Jeff Hodges
• Re: [sysreq #15869] pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 Gerald Oskoboiny via RT
• Re: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] How can we trust authenticator data flags in fmt:none response from `.create()`? (#1698) Matthew Miller via GitHub

Wednesday, 9 February 2022

• [sysreq #15869] Re: pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 Jeff Hodges via RT
• Re: pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 Jeff Hodges
• pr-preview not working correctly on webauthn PR #1663 Jeff Hodges
• Re: [webauthn] FIDO credential decommissioning (#1696) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform Errors for attestations. (#1697) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [webauthn] Errors for attestations. (#1697) John Bradley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] FIDO dredential decommissioning (#1696) Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• [webauthn] FIDO dredential decommissioning (#1696) jdenghifive via GitHub
• 02/09/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net

Tuesday, 8 February 2022

• [w3c/webauthn] aa68ab: Bit 3 MUST NOT change and formatting fixes in list Tim Cappalli
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webauthn] Pull Request: #1692 backup states in authenticator data Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 0c7405: #1692 backup states in authenticator data Tim Cappalli
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli Tim Cappalli via GitHub

Monday, 7 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665) John Bradley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Use of CBOR, and Uint8Array/ArrayBuffer (#1362) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Use of CBOR, and Uint8Array/ArrayBuffer (#1362) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub

Saturday, 5 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Lonli-Lokli via GitHub

Wednesday, 2 February 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) Mike Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] Updating IANA WebAuthn Registries for Level 2 (#1694) Silvan Mosberger via GitHub

Tuesday, 1 February 2022

• FYI: Conditional UI (aka Conditional Mediation) passed TAG review Jeff Hodges
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) =JeffH via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Last message date: Friday, 25 February 2022 10:08:14 UTC