Re: [webauthn] Device-bound key extension (#1658)

> Do you anticipate or find it an implementation hardship for the device private key to sign over both clientDataHash and userCredentialId?

Great question I should have anticipated and led with! No, there's no implementation difficulty. I was simply doing an exercise for my own education to whittle things away from this proposal and see how things break. I was also trying to come up with the RP-gets-snookered attack scenario and wasn't sure I could make it break; though as you said, signing over the `userCredentialId` is prudent anyway. 😉

Thank you for taking the time to think about this and respond!

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tylrtrmbl
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1658#issuecomment-974356303 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 19 November 2021 19:33:10 UTC