Re: [webauthn] PROPOSAL: Add support for general (hardware backed) cryptographic signatures and key exchange (#1608)

@certainlyNotHeisenberg I think you got everyone confused by adding a bunch of use cases that are not related authentication.

@Firstyear we only need to sign using ECDSA p256 a small piece of data. The is no verification needed. Also `nonces` are always present, they are required to prevent reply attacks.

@equalsJeffH the need is cryptographic signatures, web3 are websites. They don't use a database as a backend, but they are still websites.

GitHub Notification of comment by cybercent
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2021 22:16:20 UTC