Re: [webauthn] Inconsistent RP directions for handling credential transports (#1587)

I think it becomes a question of the first line actually - stating that RP must ignore unknown values, means that acceptance of an unknown value would be RP specific? So the correct word in this case is "may" I think?

It could be better to have clearer wording about the impact of unknown values here, since as you accurately note, the conflict in these statements and what should be done to handle it, should really be clarified.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Firstyear
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1587#issuecomment-803671279 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Sunday, 21 March 2021 22:30:00 UTC