- From: David Waite via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:33:38 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
> > ...(I'm also inclined to rename it, say, "cntx"). [...] Though, one could also argue that "scope" better reflects the connotations here: > > I think `ctx` is a pretty well established (and also even shorter!) abbreviation of `context`. Also, JWT abbreviates `scope` as `scp`. > > > I do think we should discuss `scope` vs `context`. > > I'll agree that "scope" seems like a slightly better name (especially since it's already described as such in the top post 😄). "scope" has expected meaning and semantics in a JWT context from usage as OAuth Access tokens. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dwaite Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1658#issuecomment-897451498 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2021 08:33:40 UTC