public-webauthn@w3.org from September 2020 by date

Wednesday, 30 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] export definitions? (#1049) Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• [webauthn] cleanup <pre class=anchors> and use <pre class="link-defaults"> as appropriate (#1489) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] export definitions? (#1049) =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 550853: Built by Travis-CI: 7839cd073aae5496176c0060c75f4d... WebAuthnBot
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] cfc0e9: Make largeBlobs explicit during create. Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Make largeBlobs explicit during create. Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Make largeBlobs explicit during create. (#1470) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174) =JeffH via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Minor cleanups from PR 1270 review (#1291) Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Clarify signature format for packed attestations et al =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] fcf2c1: Clarify signature format for packed attestations e... =JeffH
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub

Tuesday, 29 September 2020

• 09/30/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda nadalin@prodigy.net
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (#1258) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Monday, 28 September 2020

• Closed: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) John Bradley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) Keiko Itakura via GitHub

Sunday, 27 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363) Adam Langley via GitHub

Saturday, 26 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363) CrazyChris75 via GitHub

Friday, 25 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363) Adam Langley via GitHub

Thursday, 24 September 2020

• Closed: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (#1258) Thomas via GitHub

Wednesday, 23 September 2020

• 09/23/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda nadalin@prodigy.net

Tuesday, 22 September 2020

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Monday, 21 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363) CrazyChris75 via GitHub

Thursday, 17 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) Thomas via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] changing to "permissions policy" messed up MDN links (#1486) Julien Cayzac via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Wednesday, 16 September 2020

• [webauthn] changing to "permissions policy" messed up MDN links (#1486) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) =JeffH via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) John Bradley via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 4a1a06: Built by Travis-CI: 6156ba8e00b5a2ff8867008a1e0cd0... WebAuthnBot
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 6156ba: Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483) Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add note about fixed/empty user handles =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ba8b0e: Built by Travis-CI: 9e634a8a4e3b30a768cda642452c86... WebAuthnBot
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 61aaf4: Built by Travis-CI: eef23b1406d45ae95a2984311cd5e2... WebAuthnBot
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 9e634a: Remove the Psuedo-Random Function extension (#1481) J.C. Jones
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Remove the Psuedo-Random Function extension =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Remove Out-Of-Scope PRF Extension (#1478) =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] eef23b: Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissi... Julien Cayzac
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) =JeffH via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] update "feature policy" reference to new name: "permissions policy" (#1473) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) Jun Hayakawa via GitHub
• [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) Thomas via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) John Bradley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) Max Hata via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) John Bradley via GitHub

Tuesday, 15 September 2020

• [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure, from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) Keiko Itakura via GitHub
• 09/16/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda nadalin@prodigy.net
• Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483) Lucas Garron via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Arian van Putten via GitHub

Monday, 14 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483) Lucas Garron via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add note about fixed/empty user handles Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Make largeBlobs explicit during create. (#1470) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) =JeffH via GitHub

Friday, 11 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• RE: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Shane B Weeden
• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Arian van Putten via GitHub

Thursday, 10 September 2020

• [w3c/webauthn] 2fa8f9: Built by Travis-CI: 570648fa66d4a5451bee011bf3f9b4... WebAuthnBot
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• Fwd: Fall 2020 TPAC event - Registration now open Jeff Hodges
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] a08ad9: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAut... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 84cf69: Make unprotected account detection scenario more r... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) Julien Cayzac via GitHub

Wednesday, 9 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 531de2: Built by Travis-CI: 383971fa7f3ef35936b11fe8dfebbc... WebAuthnBot
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 383971: Update .spec-data .bikeshed-include cache (#1479) Julien Cayzac
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update .spec-data .bikeshed-include cache =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts (#1480) =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Remove the Psuedo-Random Function extension J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 47c935: Built by Travis-CI: ff9c5b03d2397ed10b7a285e068d08... WebAuthnBot
• [w3c/webauthn] d2ce3d: Built by Travis-CI: ff9c5b03d2397ed10b7a285e068d08... WebAuthnBot
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 7107ed: Virtual authenticators extension support Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Virtual authenticators extension support Adam Langley via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Virtual authenticator support for extensions (#1471) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) =JeffH via GitHub

Tuesday, 8 September 2020

• 09/09/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda nadalin@prodigy.net
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Monday, 7 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] undefined terms and terms we really ought to define (#462) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a08ad9: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAut... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Update .spec-data .bikeshed-include cache Julien Cayzac via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) Julien Cayzac via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) Julien Cayzac via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) Julien Cayzac via GitHub

Friday, 4 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) John Bradley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) Keiko Itakura via GitHub

Thursday, 3 September 2020

• [webauthn] Remove Out-Of-Scope PRF Extension (#1478) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ef56e0: Add script that uses Docker image to update Bikesh... Emil Lundberg
• Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 3ae650: Add script that uses Docker image to update Bikesh... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) =JeffH via GitHub
• TPAC 2020 schedule... Jeff Hodges
• Web Payment Security Interest Group (WPSIG) meeting 6,7-Oct -- WebAuthn WG update? Jeff Hodges
• Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) Julien Cayzac via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) Julien Cayzac via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) Julien Cayzac via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) Julien Cayzac via GitHub

Wednesday, 2 September 2020

• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Virtual authenticators extension support (#1472) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Virtual authenticators extension support (#1472) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) Jiewen Tan via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) Jiewen Tan via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] add additional attestation format(s) from Apple (#1453) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) Max Hata via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) Max Hata via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) Jiewen Tan via GitHub

Tuesday, 1 September 2020

• 09/02/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda nadalin@prodigy.net
• Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) Jiewen Tan via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) Jiewen Tan via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) Jiewen Tan via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2020 22:50:02 UTC