- From: Emil Lundberg via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 19:21:28 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
emlun has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/webauthn: == Minor cleanups from PR 1270 review == Unresolved discussions from https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1270#pullrequestreview-283764559 : - https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1270#discussion_r320888115 >@equalsJeffH: I'm thinking we ought to formalize the term "re-authentication" ( "re-auth" for short -- see also issue #334) and use it instead of "repeated [=authentication=]" - https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1270#discussion_r320890039 >@equalsJeffH: for "authn on device for first time" -- #334 uses term "bootstrap" (goog folks r partial to that term) some folks use the term "introduction" for it... >@emlun: I feel like that would require a proper definition of "bootstrap", and I'm not sure we'd use the term enough for it to be worth it. What do you think? - https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1270#discussion_r320890970 >@equalsJeffH: I wonder about this term "first-factor" and whether we ought to really be using "multi-factor" instead... - https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1270#discussion_r320897736 >@equalsJeffH: s/ time / time (i.e., "bootstrapping" the [=client device=]) / ...? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1291 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2019 19:21:30 UTC