Wednesday, 31 July 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174)
- Closed: [webauthn] Provide API for indicating whether the platform has attached(bound) authenticator or not (#1218)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide API for indicating whether the platform has attached(bound) authenticator or not (#1218)
- Re: [webauthn] Unspecified CBOR encoding of high-valued integer numbers due to unspecified threshold (#1044)
- Closed: [webauthn] Supported features detection from the browser (#1202)
- Re: [webauthn] Supported features detection from the browser (#1202)
- Closed: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149)
- Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149)
- Re: [webauthn] Refer to IntersectionObserver from the Security Considerations (#1105)
- Closed: [webauthn] Unspecified CBOR encoding of high-valued integer numbers due to unspecified threshold (#1044)
- Re: [webauthn] Unspecified CBOR encoding of high-valued integer numbers due to unspecified threshold (#1044)
- [webauthn] change AuthenticatorTransport to be other than an `enum` (#1268)
- Re: [webauthn] Add lightning transport (#1264)
- [w3c/webauthn] faf846: Built by Travis-CI: 4561e48f6c14e2c03c886b99a056ae...
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: make UV requirement default 'discouraged'
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 62a7b3: Add “appidExclude” extension.
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add “appidExclude” extension.
- Closed: [webauthn] Can't exclude U2F credentals (#1235)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
- Re: [webauthn] Supported features detection from the browser (#1202)
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Browser capability detection.
- Re: [webauthn] Browser capability detection. (#1219)
- Re: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174)
- Re: [webauthn] Specify authenticator attachment for authentication operation (#1267)
- Re: [webauthn] Floating-point values in the CTAP2 canonical CBOR encoding form (#1263)
- [webauthn] Specify authenticator attachment for authentication operation (#1267)
- 07/31/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
Monday, 29 July 2019
- Re: [webauthn] link to android key attestation certificate extension schema (#1265)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: link directly to android key attestation schema
- [w3c/webauthn] 2833cc: fix issue #1265
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [webauthn] link to android key attestation certificate extension schema (#1265)
Friday, 26 July 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Floating-point values in the CTAP2 canonical CBOR encoding form (#1263)
- Re: [webauthn] Floating-point values in the CTAP2 canonical CBOR encoding form (#1263)
Thursday, 25 July 2019
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Add lightning transport
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Add lightning to Transports
- [webauthn] Floating-point values in the CTAP2 canonical CBOR encoding form (#1263)
Wednesday, 24 July 2019
- RE: WebAuthn call this week?
- Re: WebAuthn call this week?
- Re: WebAuthn call this week?
- Re: WebAuthn call this week?
- Re: WebAuthn call this week?
- Re: WebAuthn call this week?
- WebAuthn call this week?
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Update index.bs
- Re: [webauthn] Add two new transport types to section 5.10.4 (#1261)
- 07/24/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda - CANCELLED
Tuesday, 23 July 2019
Friday, 19 July 2019
- Re: FacetID equivalent for WebAuthn?
- Re: FacetID equivalent for WebAuthn?
- Re: FacetID equivalent for WebAuthn?
- Re: FacetID equivalent for WebAuthn?
- Re: mixed U2F and WebAuthn
Thursday, 18 July 2019
- Re: FacetID equivalent for WebAuthn?
- Re: mixed U2F and WebAuthn
- FacetID equivalent for WebAuthn?
- mixed U2F and WebAuthn
- Re: [webauthn] Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (#1258)
Wednesday, 17 July 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174)
- Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149)
- Re: [webauthn] The user-verification default of “preferred” is catching most sites out. (#1253)
- Closed: [webauthn] The user-verification default of “preferred” is catching most sites out. (#1253)
- Re: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174)
- Re: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174)
- Re: [webauthn] Add two new transport types to section 5.10.4 (#1261)
- Re: [webauthn] Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (#1258)
- [w3c/webauthn] f60cea: Built by Travis-CI: 3ad7ad71bae0b009fef626d5a7af9f...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] c20694: Built by Travis-CI: 3ad7ad71bae0b009fef626d5a7af9f...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 31faea: Built by Travis-CI: 146d35ba3ae6a6376d58b0a008626d...
- [w3c/webauthn] 30f0f4: Built by Travis-CI: 146d35ba3ae6a6376d58b0a008626d...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 0690ac: Re-focus resident key definitions around allowCred...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Re-focus resident key definitions around allowCredentials aspect
- Closed: [webauthn] Re-focus resident key descriptions on allowCredentials aspect (#1197)
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] dcc510: Apply edits suggested in PR #1242 review
- Closed: [webauthn] Editorial improvements to use cases section (#1247)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Apply edits suggested in PR #1242 review
- [webauthn] Add two new transport types to section 5.10.4 (#1261)
- Re: [webauthn] Browser capability detection. (#1219)
- Re: [webauthn] make UV requirement default 'discouraged' (#1259)
Tuesday, 16 July 2019
- 07/17/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- [webauthn] add term "batch attestation" synonymous with "basic attestation"... (#1260)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
Monday, 15 July 2019
Saturday, 13 July 2019
- [webauthn] Pull Request: make UV requirement default 'discouraged'
- [w3c/webauthn] 565842: make UV requirement default 'discouraged'
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] The user-verification default of “preferred” is catching most sites out. (#1253)
Friday, 12 July 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add to sec cons a brief discussion of the sec properties accrued by authnr & client platform proximity (#1257)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- [webauthn] Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (#1258)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
Thursday, 11 July 2019
- Closed: [webauthn] navigator.credentials.get() option to suppress chrome UI popup if allowCredentials is not present in the authenticator (#1251)
- Re: [webauthn] navigator.credentials.get() option to suppress chrome UI popup if allowCredentials is not present in the authenticator (#1251)
- Re: [webauthn] Add to sec cons a brief discussion of the sec properties accrued by authnr & client platform proximity (#1257)
- [w3c/webauthn]
Wednesday, 10 July 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Consider allowing RPs to indicate that they want platform authenticators to be synced across devices (#969)
- Re: [webauthn] Standardising support for software authenticators (#1175)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- [w3c/webauthn] ce0a69: Built by Travis-CI: d2a4543f4adabd7cafebae70d25fa0...
- [w3c/webauthn] 48159e: Built by Travis-CI: d2a4543f4adabd7cafebae70d25fa0...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 09b53b: Move user handle requirements to user.id definition
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Move user handle requirements to user.id definition
- Closed: [webauthn] PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity.id's length limit ought to be (also) stated... (#1252)
- Re: [webauthn] Add “appidExclude” extension. (#1244)
- Re: [webauthn] Add “appidExclude” extension. (#1244)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a WebDriver Virtual Authenticator extension (#1256)
- [webauthn] Add to sec cons a brief discussion of the sec properties accrued by authnr & client platform proximity (#1257)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a WebDriver Virtual Authenticator extension (#1256)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Add a WebDriver Virtual Authenticator extension
- Re: Please add Nina Satragno to github.com/w3c/webauthn team(s)...
- Re: Please add Nina Satragno to github.com/w3c/webauthn team(s)...
- Please add Nina Satragno to github.com/w3c/webauthn team(s)...
- Re: [webauthn] navigator.credentials.get() option to suppress chrome UI popup if allowCredentials is not present in the authenticator (#1251)
Tuesday, 9 July 2019
- 07/10/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- FW: Refinements to COSE and JOSE Registrations for WebAuthn Algorithms
Monday, 8 July 2019
Friday, 5 July 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
Thursday, 4 July 2019
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Move user handle requirements to user.id definition
- [w3c/webauthn] 09b53b: Move user handle requirements to user.id definition
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] The user-verification default of “preferred” is catching most sites out. (#1253)
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticators that do not recognize any handles shouldn't just be dropped on the floor (#863)
- Closed: [webauthn] Authenticators that do not recognize any handles shouldn't just be dropped on the floor (#863)
Wednesday, 3 July 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticators that do not recognize any handles shouldn't just be dropped on the floor (#863)
- [webauthn] The user-verification default of “preferred” is catching most sites out. (#1253)
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticators that do not recognize any handles shouldn't just be dropped on the floor (#863)
- [webauthn] PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity.id's length limit ought to be (also) stated... (#1252)
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticators that do not recognize any handles shouldn't just be dropped on the floor (#863)
- Re: [webauthn] Add “appidExclude” extension. (#1244)
- Re: [webauthn] Privacy risk from revealing allowed credentials (#1246)
- HowTo: list of open issues without pr-open or ongoing
- [w3c/webauthn] 4154a5: Add note that resident credentials don't require e...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
Tuesday, 2 July 2019
- 07/03/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda - CANCELLED
- [w3c/webauthn] 8e5819: Prettify whitespace
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] 5c82e0: Use more accurate terms as pointed out by @equalsJ...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] 5dc308: Apply more suggestions from code review=0D
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] 0e755d: Apply suggestions from code review=0D
- Re: [webauthn] Privacy risk from revealing allowed credentials (#1246)
- Re: [webauthn] Privacy risk from revealing allowed credentials (#1246)
- Re: [webauthn] navigator.credentials.get() option to suppress chrome UI popup if allowCredentials is not present in the authenticator (#1251)
- Re: [webauthn] navigator.credentials.get() option to suppress chrome UI popup if allowCredentials is not present in the authenticator (#1251)
- Re: [webauthn] navigator.credentials.get() option to suppress chrome UI popup if allowCredentials is not present in the authenticator (#1251)
- Re: [webauthn] navigator.credentials.get() option to suppress chrome UI popup if allowCredentials is not present in the authenticator (#1251)
Monday, 1 July 2019
- [webauthn] navigator.credentials.get() option to suppress chrome UI popup if allowCredentials is not present in the authenticator (#1251)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Add privacy considerations about credential IDs
- [w3c/webauthn] 548dd5: Add privacy consideration about PII leak via crede...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] 71f92c: Propose second-factor use case as mitigation for u...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Privacy risk from revealing allowed credentials (#1246)
- [w3c/webauthn] 0690ac: Re-focus resident key definitions around allowCred...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Re-focus resident key definitions around allowCredentials aspect
- [w3c/webauthn] 0515c3: Re-focus resident key definitions around allowCred...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun