Tuesday, 30 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Rewrite security consideration on attestation and MitM attacks (#1095)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
Saturday, 27 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Add considerations for string truncation.
Thursday, 25 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: how to handle multiple domains
- Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147)
- Re: [webauthn] Q: Regarding Security Concerns Surrounding WebAuthn: Don't Implement ECDAA (Yet) (#1196)
Wednesday, 24 April 2019
- Re: extension support in the wild?
- Re: extension support in the wild?
- extension support in the wild?
- Re: how to handle multiple domains
- [webauthn] Clarify 127.0.0.1 in spec (#1204)
- Re: TPAC 2019
- Closed: [webauthn] Underspecified RP ID length (#1198)
- Re: [webauthn] truncation to 64-byte upper limit doesn't mention character boundaries (#973)
- Re: [webauthn] Integrate with Feature Policy or Permissions and define appropriate identifier value for WebAuthn (#911)
- Re: [webauthn] Integrate with Feature Policy or Permissions and define appropriate identifier value for WebAuthn (#911)
- Re: [webauthn] Supported features detection from the browser (#1202)
- TPAC 2019
- RE: 04/24/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Update Authenticator Definition (#1195)
- Re: how to handle multiple domains
- Re: [webauthn] Underspecified RP ID length (#1198)
- Re: how to handle multiple domains
- Re: [webauthn] Underspecified RP ID length (#1198)
- Re: [webauthn] Underspecified RP ID length (#1198)
Tuesday, 23 April 2019
Wednesday, 24 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Underspecified RP ID length (#1198)
- Re: 04/24/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Add some embellishments to @equalsJeffH's suggestions (#1203)
- Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060)
- Re: [webauthn] Underspecified RP ID length (#1198)
- Re: [webauthn] Rewrite security consideration on attestation and MitM attacks (#1095)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
Tuesday, 23 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- 04/24/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Rewrite security consideration on attestation and MitM attacks (#1095)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Add some embellishments to @equalsJeffH's suggestions
- [w3c/webauthn] 12cd06: Accept suggestions from @equalsJeffH
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- Re: [webauthn] Supported features detection from the browser (#1202)
- Re: [webauthn] Supported features detection from the browser (#1202)
Monday, 22 April 2019
- [webauthn] Supported features detection from the browser (#1202)
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
Friday, 19 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: remove "required" from PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor.id
- Re: [webauthn] remove "required" from PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor.id (#500)
- Re: [webauthn] remove "required" on ScopedCredentialDescriptor.id (#245)
- Closed: [webauthn] remove "required" on ScopedCredentialDescriptor.id (#245)
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
- Re: [webauthn] remove "required" on ScopedCredentialDescriptor.id (#245)
Thursday, 18 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Re-focus resident key descriptions on allowCredentials aspect (#1197)
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
- Re: [webauthn] explicitly mention running over TLS in WebAuthn API intro (#1201)
- [webauthn] explicitly mention running over TLS in WebAuthn API intro (#1201)
- [w3c/webauthn] 175d9f: Clarify user identification in RP assertion verifi...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- tools for extracting lists of issues and PRs from github repos
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
Wednesday, 17 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: [webauthn] Re-focus resident key descriptions on allowCredentials aspect (#1197)
- Re: [webauthn] Update Authenticator Definition (#1195)
- Re: [webauthn] Underspecified RP ID length (#1198)
- Re: [webauthn] Update Authenticator Definition (#1195)
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
- Re: [webauthn] Update Authenticator Definition (#1195)
- [w3c/webauthn] 25edba: Built by Travis-CI: 5d11e6255b85665d9faa8763e1de8c...
- [w3c/webauthn] 42530c: Built by Travis-CI: 5d11e6255b85665d9faa8763e1de8c...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] a946a0: Created linkable definition for WebAuthn Extension...
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Created linkable definition for WebAuthn Extensions and linked to it …
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Closed: [webauthn] Create linkable definition for "WebAuthn Extension(s)" (#1180)
- [w3c/webauthn] 191e67: Linked attestation statement format term in Sectio...
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Linked attestation statement format term in Section 8.1 to its defini…
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Closed: [webauthn] link "attestation statement format" term in Section 8.1 to its definition (#1179)
- Re: [webauthn] Linked attestation statement format term in Section 8.1 to its defini… (#1192)
- Re: [webauthn] Rewrite security consideration on attestation and MitM attacks (#1095)
- [w3c/webauthn] cdf508: Built by Travis-CI: 2a68f5484246ddd44bb98c9a25568f...
- [w3c/webauthn] 34d410: Built by Travis-CI: 2a68f5484246ddd44bb98c9a25568f...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] f1b55b: Update isUVPAA() scenario to agree with spec
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update isUVPAA() scenario to agree with spec
- Closed: [webauthn] Consistency between scenario "Registration specifically with UVPA" and former removal of confirmation prompt for isUVPAA() (#1178)
- Re: [webauthn] Update isUVPAA() scenario to agree with spec (#1184)
- Re: [webauthn] Linked attestation statement format term in Section 8.1 to its defini… (#1192)
- Re: [webauthn] Created linkable definition for WebAuthn Extensions and linked to it … (#1193)
- [w3c/webauthn] 07b58d: Point out that isUVPAA example ends if isUVPAA ret...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] 2a2547: Address review comments by @selfissued
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] 7fe7c1: Address review comments by @selfissued
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: 04/17/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Added TPM verification clarifications (#966)
- Re: [webauthn] Update Authenticator Definition (#1195)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Web Payment Security Interest Group Launched
- Re: [webauthn] Update name, displayname and icon for RP and user (#1200)
- Re: [webauthn] Update name, displayname and icon for RP and user (#1200)
- Re: [webauthn] Update name, displayname and icon for RP and user (#1200)
- Re: [webauthn] Update name, displayname and icon for RP and user (#1200)
- Re: [webauthn] Update name, displayname and icon for RP and user (#1200)
- Re: [webauthn] Update name, displayname and icon for RP and user (#1200)
- Re: [webauthn] Update name, displayname and icon for RP and user (#1200)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: [webauthn] finish up on "provide transport info during registration" (#1188)
- [webauthn] Update name, displayname and icon for RP and user (#1200)
Tuesday, 16 April 2019
Monday, 15 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
- Re: [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
- [webauthn] How to get supported client extension (#1199)
Thursday, 11 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954)
- Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954)
- Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954)
- Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954)
- Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954)
- Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954)
- Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954)
- Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954)
Wednesday, 10 April 2019
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 1392e5: Built by Travis-CI: 49fe1bb791362c271b95573924aad7...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 61067a: Built by Travis-CI: 49fe1bb791362c271b95573924aad7...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 63640b: Fixed various links, including new TR link
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fixed various links, including new TR link
Tuesday, 9 April 2019
Friday, 5 April 2019
- Re: [webauthn] Fixed various links, including new TR link (#1161)
- Re: [webauthn] Allow authenticators to do None instead of Self attestation (#1182)
- Re: [webauthn] Allow authenticators to do None instead of Self attestation (#1182)
Wednesday, 3 April 2019
- [w3c/webauthn] 486eb7: Note that appid should be set to the previously us...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Re-focus resident key descriptions on allowCredentials aspect (#1197)
- Re: [webauthn] Indicate resident key credential "preferred" during registration and find out what the authenticator offered (#991)
- [w3c/webauthn] de1b96: Built by Travis-CI: d76ddf59892c12087b18399b89bb95...
- [w3c/webauthn] fa8810: Built by Travis-CI: d76ddf59892c12087b18399b89bb95...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- Re: [webauthn] Update isUVPAA() scenario to agree with spec (#1184)
- Re: [webauthn] Update isUVPAA() scenario to agree with spec (#1184)
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 88695f: Allow authenticators to do None instead of Self at...
- [w3c/webauthn] b89403: Revert change to new TR link
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Allow authenticators to do None instead of Self attestation
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Closed: [webauthn] MUST authenticators still perform self attestation? (#978)
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Revert change to new TR link
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Revert change to new TR link (#1186)
- Re: 04/03/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Integrate with Feature Policy or Permissions and define appropriate identifier value for WebAuthn (#911)
- Re: [webauthn] Standardising support for software authenticators (#1175)
- Re: 04/03/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Indicate resident key credential "preferred" during registration and find out what the authenticator offered (#991)
- Re: [webauthn] Indicate resident key credential "preferred" during registration and find out what the authenticator offered (#991)
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticators that do not recognize any handles shouldn't just be dropped on the floor (#863)
- Re: [webauthn] Initial proposal for modifications to resident key credential requirements (#1191)
- Re: [webauthn] Indicate resident key credential "preferred" during registration and find out what the authenticator offered (#991)
- Re: Reminder that the W3C WebAuthn call is at 12:00PM PDT now, the time slot has moved from a 10:00AM PDT slot
- Reminder that the W3C WebAuthn call is at 12:00PM PDT now, the time slot has moved from a 10:00AM PDT slot
- 04/03/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda