- From: John Fontana <jfontana@yubico.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:50:21 -0600
- To: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANNOEbLr=6Ruxnu4515YcXOELo6OLG85LksB=Z3UTE1feuOowA@mail.gmail.com>
#webauthn: (no topic set) [11:00] == jfontana [~jfontana@public.cloak] has joined #webauthn [11:01] <elundberg> present+ [11:01] <jeffh> present+ [11:04] <plh_> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2018JulSep/0139.html [11:04] <jeffh> invite zakim? [11:04] <jfontana> Tony: philippe is on and will fill us in [11:04] <jfontana> PLH: we looked at reuest and we have a few questionsa nd maybe one major concner. [11:04] <jfontana> ...first is the one that could be major, it is about the extensions. [11:05] <jfontana> ...understanding we when yo moved to CR if any extensions would be dropped or made informative. [11:05] <jfontana> ...they were kept as optional [11:05] <jfontana> tony: let me address. Giri is pulling together set of arguments for arguments. [11:06] <jfontana> ...that will be presentedat the TPAC timeframe. [11:06] <jfontana> ...we will argue all the extensions should be informal and optional [11:06] <jfontana> ..we beoieve we have basis of argument [11:06] <jfontana> plh: hav eot have a phone call wit the director. [11:06] <jfontana> ...it sould help to organize a phone call on that. [11:06] <jfontana> ...the other ones are not as critical [11:07] <jfontana> ...we notice that the spec is using an IETF draft for token binding. [11:07] <jfontana> .we did see the email from the chair of that group, but we don't know the status [11:07] <jfontana> self-issue: they are RFC , with the editor and expect them in days. [11:08] <jfontana> plh: you have said enough, we believe you [11:08] <jfontana> ...tahnk you [11:11] <jfontana> ...the next question was, want improvement of working on slight way we talk about what issue gaining or losing focus on document, change is paragraph issue in 5.6 of spec. [11:11] <jfontana> ...say the issue will be updated. [11:11] <jfontana> self-issue: fine for you to do that [11:11] <jfontana> tony:it is editorial change. [11:11] <jfontana> plh [11:12] <jfontana> plh: we address lot of issues that are in edtiiors draft , update those links to the current draft. [11:12] <jfontana> ...if there are any links that would become broken in the operation we will come back to you , OK? [11:12] <jfontana> tony: good to me [11:12] <jfontana> plh: build consistencies in your references. [11:13] <jfontana> ...last point is interop report. [11:13] <jfontana> ...we received this information. we looked at it and we had some tests in wpt on web auth and most of those are failing. are those tests relevant. [11:14] <jfontana> tony: this is the interop. getting it green for Edge vs. the red status [11:14] <jfontana> akshay: adam's list. [11:14] <plh_> https://wpt.fyi/results/webauthn?label=stable&aligned=true [11:14] <jfontana> ? [11:14] <jfontana> tony: answer is they will not fail. we are updating. [11:15] <jfontana> ...we will update the matrix for the test that failed [11:15] <jfontana> plh: ok. it would be nice to have to updates done when we talk to the director. [11:16] <jfontana> ...i tried to run all those tests and I was able to get into green, we thought the tests may not have been run properly. [11:16] <jfontana> skshay: which link are you talking about, which test [11:16] <jfontana> plh: I put the link in IRC [11:16] <jfontana> ...we need to run these tests. [11:17] <jfontana> tony: this may also have to do on how we are running the tests. [11:17] <jfontana> ...we should have a phone call and pull in Adam. [11:17] == john_bradley [~john_bradley@public.cloak] has joined #webauthn [11:17] <jfontana> plh: can you generate a repo to look at the conditions when red, when green [11:17] <jfontana> ...so this is it. [11:18] <jfontana> ...we need phone call to talk about the extensions. [11:18] <jfontana> ...mike jones, sam, giri, co-chairs, [11:18] <jfontana> ..and maybe jeeH [11:18] <jfontana> jeffH: sure. [11:18] <jfontana> plh: timeline? [11:18] <jfontana> tony: we would like to have this by next week some time. [11:19] <jfontana> ..i need a few days to talk to giri. [11:19] <jfontana> plh: OK [11:19] <jfontana> tony: talking next week. [11:20] <jfontana> jfontana: monday, tues. wed. [11:20] <jfontana> ...days we need to do it.many headed to FIDO plenary [11:20] <jfontana> tony: and we have issues with the tests. we should have a separate call with Adam [11:21] <jfontana> ...let me talk to adam [11:21] <jfontana> maybe we don't need a call. [11:21] <jfontana> ...we will tried to get this cleared up next week [11:22] <jfontana> plh: yes [11:24] <jeffh> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1082 [11:24] <jfontana> emil: JeffH are you suggesting we restructure the algorithm step? or is it a counter issue? [11:25] <jfontana> ...the server might have already identified the user, or not. [11:25] <jfontana> jeffH: it is just the terms that I am concerned about. [11:26] <jfontana> emil: not sure how to get around owner / user [11:26] <jfontana> jeffH: the term identified, we don't have that notion defined. don't know what account is being used. [11:26] <jfontana> ...it is RP specific. [11:27] <jfontana> ...the term identified. did we mean user verification. no. [11:28] <jfontana> emil (elundberg): you could have the request refer to values that were used in the request [11:28] <jfontana> jeffH: there is not a step to verify the credential source.. [11:28] <jfontana> ...we need steps for the RP on creation. [11:29] == plh_ has changed nick to plh [11:30] <jfontana> ...one could argue we punt this to level 2 [11:30] <jfontana> elundberg: it wold be a technical issue [11:30] <jfontana> JeffH: i will try to propose tech today. [11:31] <elundberg> s/tech/text/ [11:31] <jfontana> agl: the HMAC secret extension did you use hypen or underscore [11:31] <jfontana> akshay: have not seen hypen before, but it looks like it is supported [11:32] <jfontana> agl: I think we will support it. [11:32] <jfontana> akshay: it is a hypen. [11:32] <jfontana> agl: also #1050 I updated it, it is transports in registrations [11:33] <jfontana> akshay: i think this looks fine, let me look at it. -- John Fontana Identity and Standards Analyst | Yubico <http://www.yubico.com/> Phone: +1 303 301 4437 Skype: j_fontana
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2018 17:51:05 UTC