With respect to current process (https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#rec-pr), what is the plan for the currently-identified ‘at risk’ features? -Giri Mandyam From: John Fontana <jfontana@yubico.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 1:17 PM To: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org> Cc: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>; Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Consensus - Web Authentication specification Some have pointed out that my call to action on consensus is not clear. My apologies. So trying again. The Web AuthN WG would like to move its Web AuthN spec to Proposed Recommendation. Please answer whether you object or approve of this move. (silence will be counted as approval). thanks. john fontana Web AuthN co-chair On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:14 PM, John Fontana <jfontana@yubico.com<mailto:jfontana@yubico.com>> wrote: This is a call for consensus to move the current editor's draft to Proposed Recommendation as the Web AuthN WG completes work toward this milestone. -- John Fontana Identity and Standards Analyst | Yubico<http://www.yubico.com/> Phone: +1 303 301 4437 Skype: j_fontana -- John Fontana Identity and Standards Analyst | Yubico<http://www.yubico.com/> Phone: +1 303 301 4437 Skype: j_fontana
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2018 20:55:40 UTC