Saturday, 29 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] No way to specify transports during registration step
- Closed: [webauthn] No way to specify transports during registration step
- [webauthn] No way to specify transports during registration step
Friday, 28 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] update token binding citation
- [webauthn] Typo
- [webauthn] Leap of Faith not only for Self and None Attestation Types
Thursday, 27 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify user identification in RP assertion verification operation
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticator selection extension needs to define snapshotting behavior
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticator selection extension needs to define snapshotting behavior
- Re: Transition Request: Web Authentication to Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [webauthn] `CredentialRequestOptions` make otherwise valid values invalid in an undesirable way
Wednesday, 26 September 2018
- [webauthn] Pull Request: update token binding citation
- Re: Substitute minutes of W3C Web Authn meeting 26-Sep-2018
- Re: Substitute minutes of W3C Web Authn meeting 26-Sep-2018
- [w3c/webauthn] 19e76a: update token binding citation
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: Transition Request: Web Authentication to Proposed Recommendation
- Substitute minutes of W3C Web Authn meeting 26-Sep-2018
- Re: Transition Request: Web Authentication to Proposed Recommendation
- [webauthn] update token binding reference to ref the actual RFC
- Re: Transition Request: Web Authentication to Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [webauthn] Typo in Figure 1?
- [w3c/webauthn] d38d12: Built by Travis-CI: 2056feede7550649ff61bdfce17d96...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 2056fe: Code of Conduct
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by plehegar
Tuesday, 25 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] Typo in Figure 1?
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Issue 1084 figure typo
- [w3c/webauthn] 665733: Fix typo in figure 1
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Typo in Figure 1?
- Re: [webauthn] Typo in Figure 1?
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify which user to authenticate if userHandle is not present
Monday, 24 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify which user to authenticate if userHandle is not present
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify which user to authenticate if userHandle is not present
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify which user to authenticate if userHandle is not present
- Closed: [webauthn] Clarify which user to authenticate if userHandle is not present
Sunday, 23 September 2018
Friday, 21 September 2018
- Transition Request: Web Authentication to Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
Thursday, 20 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] NULL or DOMException
- [w3c/webauthn] 5fee95: Built by Travis-CI: ee934de2c8524528b5228af565eb72...
- [w3c/webauthn] 693fd4: Built by Travis-CI: ee934de2c8524528b5228af565eb72...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 2af689: Fix #1076 - Don't confuse extension optionality in...
- Closed: [webauthn] Section 10: extensions are OPTIONAL
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by YubicoDemo
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix #1076 - Don't confuse extension optionality in Sec 10
- Re: [webauthn] NULL or DOMException
- [w3c/webauthn]
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1076 - Don't confuse extension optionality in Sec 10
- [w3c/webauthn]
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1076 - Don't confuse extension optionality in Sec 10
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1076 - Don't confuse extension optionality in Sec 10
- [w3c/webauthn] 51fcbe: Built by Travis-CI: 29bbee1b02de1f3607df185aa0ca2e...
- Re: [webauthn] NULL or DOMException
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1076 - Don't confuse extension optionality in Sec 10
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] e9f033: Built by Travis-CI: 29bbee1b02de1f3607df185aa0ca2e...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 24d91f: Built by Travis-CI: 661a8575fb3156134d64ecdc56208d...
- [w3c/webauthn] 6a05ce: Built by Travis-CI: 661a8575fb3156134d64ecdc56208d...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 29bbee: Un-revert change from 8e5f2e0 reverted in daf9522 ...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Un-revert change from 8e5f2e0 reverted in daf9522
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku
- Closed: [webauthn] FIDO U2F supports Attestation CA (AttCA)?
- [w3c/webauthn] 661a85: token binding ID is a client platform-specific ope...
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: note that obtaining a token binding ID is a client platform-specific operation
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku
- Closed: [webauthn] Explain how Token Binding IDs get associated with an HTML context.
- [w3c/webauthn]
- Re: [webauthn] Fix typo
- [w3c/webauthn] a7773d: Built by Travis-CI: 76cf6dfb3ef6744c52d3796cd2569f...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 5721bf: Built by Travis-CI: 76cf6dfb3ef6744c52d3796cd2569f...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 76cf6d: Fix typo (#1081)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix typo
- Closed: [webauthn] Typo in Android SafetyNet verification procedure
- Re: [webauthn] Section 10: extensions are OPTIONAL
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix #1076 - Don't confuse extension optionality in Sec 10
- Re: [webauthn] Un-revert change from 8e5f2e0 reverted in daf9522
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify user identification in RP assertion verification operation
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify user identification in RP assertion verification operation
- [w3c/webauthn]
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Clarify user identification in RP assertion verification operation
- [w3c/webauthn] 175d9f: Clarify user identification in RP assertion verifi...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Fix typo
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix typo
- [w3c/webauthn] 09a81c: Fix typo
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Typo in Android SafetyNet verification procedure
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify which user to authenticate if userHandle is not present
- Re: [webauthn] FIDO U2F supports Attestation CA (AttCA)?
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Un-revert change from 8e5f2e0 reverted in daf9522
- [w3c/webauthn] 327af5: Un-revert change from 8e5f2e0 reverted in daf9522
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Clarify which user to authenticate if userHandle is not present
- Re: [webauthn] NULL or DOMException
- Re: [webauthn] Explain how Token Binding IDs get associated with an HTML context.
- [webauthn] Pull Request: note that obtaining a token binding ID is a client platform-specific operation
- [w3c/webauthn] d7e181: fix #360
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- Re: [webauthn] Explain how Token Binding IDs get associated with an HTML context.
- Re: [webauthn] NULL or DOMException
- Re: [webauthn] Section 10: extensions are OPTIONAL
Wednesday, 19 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] Section 10: extensions are OPTIONAL
- Re: [webauthn] Section 10: extensions are OPTIONAL
- [webauthn] Section 10: extensions are OPTIONAL
- [w3c/webauthn] 9b2016: Built by Travis-CI: daf95225fc9edfe0a894c747d91b2c...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] cc945b: Built by Travis-CI: daf95225fc9edfe0a894c747d91b2c...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] daf952: Clarify use of authorization lists in Android Key ...
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Clarify use of authorization lists in Android Key Attestation
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku
- Closed: [webauthn] Ambiguous/wrong instructions in Android Key Attestation Statement Format verification procedure
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticator selection extension needs to define snapshotting behavior
- Closed: [webauthn] Authenticator selection extension needs to define snapshotting behavior
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify use of authorization lists in Android Key Attestation
- [w3c/webauthn] e8f7a2: Built by Travis-CI: 1679de2d1c989ff6de8331d1ee4a15...
- [w3c/webauthn] be2f5d: Built by Travis-CI: 1679de2d1c989ff6de8331d1ee4a15...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 1679de: Issue #294 - Add a non-normative comment about sna...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Issue #294 - Add a non-normative comment about snapshotting BufferSources
- Re: [webauthn] Issue #294 - Add a non-normative comment about snapshotting BufferSources
- Closed: [webauthn] Document wide review
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify use of authorization lists in Android Key Attestation
- [w3c/webauthn] 89604c: Built by Travis-CI: e8ba348b5605c8a8ea1d3e6514d6c5...
- [w3c/webauthn] c60b97: Built by Travis-CI: e8ba348b5605c8a8ea1d3e6514d6c5...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] e8ba34: cognitive-accessibility consideration (#1075)
- Closed: [webauthn] cognitive-accessibility consideration
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: cognitive
- Re: [webauthn] cognitive
- [w3c/webauthn] 6adfc5: Feedback-01
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku
- Re: [webauthn] Issue #294 - Add a non-normative comment about snapshotting BufferSources
- Re: [webauthn] cognitive
- [webauthn] Pull Request: cognitive
- [w3c/webauthn] f73e78: cognitive
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku
- Re: [webauthn] Document wide review
- [w3c/webauthn] ed89ef: Built by Travis-CI: 802613e829023466784acad62c4633...
- [w3c/webauthn] 0ff9ee: Built by Travis-CI: 802613e829023466784acad62c4633...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- Closed: [webauthn] Mobile support
- [w3c/webauthn] 802613: Issue #1045 - Add Platform-Specific Implementation...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Issue #1045 - Add Platform-Specific Implementation Guidance
- Closed: [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct
- Re: [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Issue #294 - Add a non-normative comment about snapshotting BufferSources
- Re: [webauthn] cognitive-accessibility consideration
- Re: [webauthn] Issue #1045 - Add Platform-Specific Implementation Guidance
- Re: [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct
- Re: [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticator selection extension needs to define snapshotting behavior
- Re: [webauthn] Authenticator selection extension needs to define snapshotting behavior
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Issue #1045 - Add Platform-Specific Implementation Guidance
- TPAC 2018 - Registration fees and hotel bookings
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- Closed: [webauthn] address needs of various webauthn spec audiences
- Re: [webauthn] Mobile support
- [w3c/webauthn] 46b133: Built by Travis-CI: 16fee7b5c951ab1bacbd84fe280d88...
- [w3c/webauthn] 5e8ce8: Built by Travis-CI: 16fee7b5c951ab1bacbd84fe280d88...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 529747: Fix #1068: Fix a reference to privacy consideratio...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix #1068: Fix a reference to privacy considerations
- Closed: [webauthn] Wrong Registration Ceremony Privacy Reference
- [w3c/webauthn] 5568ae: Built by Travis-CI: a6cc20dd78b480d99ab1dfa918f05e...
- [w3c/webauthn] f23c10: Built by Travis-CI: a6cc20dd78b480d99ab1dfa918f05e...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] be30a2: Add note about Basic and AttCA being indistinguish...
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Highlight Basic/AttCA ambiguity in definitions and verification procedures
- Closed: [webauthn] FIDO U2F supports Attestation CA (AttCA)?
- 09/19/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Highlight Basic/AttCA ambiguity in definitions and verification procedures
Tuesday, 18 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: wrt "meta pull-requests" milestone...
- RE: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: wrt "meta pull-requests" milestone...
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1068: Fix a reference to privacy considerations
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1068: Fix a reference to privacy considerations
- wrt "meta pull-requests" milestone...
- Re: [webauthn] Highlight Basic/AttCA ambiguity in definitions and verification procedures
- Re: [webauthn] address needs of various webauthn spec audiences
- Re: WebAuthn demo at TPAC Dev meetup?
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 8e5f2e: Make implementation-specificness of attestn.verif....
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Make implementation-specificness of attestn.verif. return values more explicit
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] b25408: Add links, thanks @equalsJeffH!
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: WebAuthn demo at TPAC Dev meetup?
- Re: [webauthn] Highlight Basic/AttCA ambiguity in definitions and verification procedures
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1068: Fix a reference to privacy considerations
- [w3c/webauthn] 02daac: Built by Travis-CI: 9d497577d8fdc272c626efc2583628...
- [w3c/webauthn] ef1fcc: Built by Travis-CI: 9d497577d8fdc272c626efc2583628...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 9d4975: fix #403: user handle - account relationship (#105...
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix #403: user handle - account relationship
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Closed: [webauthn] some RPs may wish to allow multiple registrations to same user account
- Re: WebAuthn demo at TPAC Dev meetup?
- Re: [webauthn] Ambiguous/wrong instructions in Android Key Attestation Statement Format verification procedure
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Clarify use of authorization lists in Android Key Attestation
- Re: [webauthn] Highlight Basic/AttCA ambiguity in definitions and verification procedures
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Make implementation-specificness of attestn.verif. return values more explicit
- [w3c/webauthn] 8e5f2e: Make implementation-specificness of attestn.verif....
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Ambiguous/wrong instructions in Android Key Attestation Statement Format verification procedure
- [w3c/webauthn] bf6a60: Built by Travis-CI: 06c4808ce4fdeefc4c6d6264dd6aee...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 4f790f: Built by Travis-CI: 06c4808ce4fdeefc4c6d6264dd6aee...
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 80eaff: Spell out that values expressing attestation type ...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Spell out that values expressing attestation type are implementation specific
- Re: [webauthn] Spell out that values expressing attestation type are implementation specific
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 77af8a: Update figure 1 to agree with figure 2 on clientDa...
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix #1059: Update figure 1 to agree with figure 2 on clientDataJSON naming
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Closed: [webauthn] Update Figure 1 to follow up the spec modification
- Re: [webauthn] fix #403: user handle - account relationship
- Re: [webauthn] Highlight Basic/AttCA ambiguity in definitions and verification procedures
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1059: Update figure 1 to agree with figure 2 on clientDataJSON naming
- [w3c/webauthn] af62ff: Built by Travis-CI: 28f32160e6a6b03847d523fc6237ec...
- [w3c/webauthn] a095a9: Built by Travis-CI: 28f32160e6a6b03847d523fc6237ec...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 28f321: fix: defelopers -> developers (#1067)
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix: defelopers -> developers
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn] d054b3: fix misspelling
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] fix #403: user handle - account relationship
- [w3c/webauthn] 38ef98: remove Note, thx emlun ;)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] fix #403: user handle - account relationship
Monday, 17 September 2018
- Closed: [webauthn] Pre-registration discovery for roaming authenticators
- Re: [webauthn] Pre-registration discovery for roaming authenticators
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1059: Update figure 1 to agree with figure 2 on clientDataJSON naming
- All PropRec PRs ready to merge
- Re: [webauthn] About the canonical CBOR encoding form
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Spell out that values expressing attestation type are implementation specific
- [w3c/webauthn] 80eaff: Spell out that values expressing attestation type ...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] 5517fe: Address most of @equalsJeffH's review comments
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix #1068: Fix a reference to privacy considerations
- [w3c/webauthn] 529747: Fix #1068: Fix a reference to privacy consideratio...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Wrong Registration Ceremony Privacy Reference
- [webauthn] Wrong Registration Ceremony Privacy Reference
Friday, 14 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] fix: defelopers -> developers
- [webauthn] Pull Request: fix: defelopers -> developers
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
- [w3c/webauthn] b8f7ac: Built by Travis-CI: 426512a1d8a9d056b544e8b68a807d...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] ad1e2c: Built by Travis-CI: 426512a1d8a9d056b544e8b68a807d...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 426512: enumerate supported attstn types for packed attstn...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: enumerate actual supported attstn types for packed attestation statement format
- Closed: [webauthn] Packed attestation statement format supports all types but None ?
- [webauthn] Pull Request: enumerate actual supported attstn types for packed attestation statement format
- [w3c/webauthn] d4faac: enumerate supported attstn types for packed attstn...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: PR 1052 review suggestion
- Re: [webauthn] PR 1052 review suggestion
- Re: [webauthn] fix #403: user handle - account relationship
- [w3c/webauthn]
- Closed: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- Re: [webauthn] Verify signature first in RP operations?
- [w3c/webauthn] 9e97b5: Built by Travis-CI: b90f7f53e713a8a2cc36c8b973acd6...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- Re: [webauthn] Packed attestation statement format supports all types but None ?
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] b90f7f: add 'spec roadmap' section (#375)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: add 'spec roadmap' section
- [w3c/webauthn] cf07d2: update per emlun's comment, thx!
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] Update Figure 1 to follow up the spec modification
- [w3c/webauthn] c90bd2: Built by Travis-CI: 398016e36c8a3a925be918ca3807d2...
- [w3c/webauthn] 0b217c: Built by Travis-CI: 398016e36c8a3a925be918ca3807d2...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn] 398016: Add Credential Loss and Key Mobility section to se...
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add Credential Loss and Key Mobility section to security considerations
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Closed: [webauthn] User agent / key management [authenticator] interoperability requirements?
- Re: [webauthn] Add Credential Loss and Key Mobility section to security considerations
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- Re: [webauthn] fix #403: user handle - account relationship
- [w3c/webauthn] 4d5a9e: clarify relation of user handle as value of 'user....
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- [w3c/webauthn] 5c33b6: Add Username Enumeration section to privacy consid...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] Unspecified CBOR encoding of high-valued integer numbers due to unspecified threshold
- Re: [webauthn] Verify signature first in RP operations?
- [w3c/webauthn] 5c33b6: Add Username Enumeration section to privacy consid...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- [webauthn] Packed attestation statement format supports all types but None ?
Tuesday, 11 September 2018
- 09/12/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- [w3c/webauthn] 5c33b6: Add Username Enumeration section to privacy consid...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] Fix #1059: Update figure 1 to agree with figure 2 on clientDataJSON naming
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] Verify signature first in RP operations?
- [w3c/webauthn] 1aedd4: Built by Travis-CI: db351cdea0e4e3efb9adb9b35c1ff1...
- [w3c/webauthn] 07ca17: Built by Travis-CI: db351cdea0e4e3efb9adb9b35c1ff1...
- [w3c/webauthn] 16c4c1: Built by Travis-CI: 5bdcae469479554be47a368cb22adb...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 5c33b6: Add Username Enumeration section to privacy consid...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add Username Enumeration section to privacy considerations
- Closed: [webauthn] Security threat: Username enumeration
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] e29dba: Adopt consistent case for section headings
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Adopt consistent case for section headings
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Closed: [webauthn] Adopt consistent case for section headings
Monday, 10 September 2018
- [w3c/webauthn] 494d57: Define "bound" for credentials and use the term "s...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: WebAuthn demo at TPAC Dev meetup?
- [w3c/webauthn] dbc455: fix oopsies and try to polish
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn] 6899e7: fix an oops
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn] e6467a: revise Note, thx emlun!
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: WebAuthn demo at TPAC Dev meetup?
- Re: WebAuthn demo at TPAC Dev meetup?
- [webauthn] Verify signature first in RP operations?
- [w3c/webauthn] 845e92: Add missing commas
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Adding the way to get trust anchors for CTAP1/U2F authenticators
- [w3c/webauthn] 435225: Add missing commas
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side
- Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix #1059: Update figure 1 to agree with figure 2 on clientDataJSON naming
- [w3c/webauthn] 77af8a: Update figure 1 to agree with figure 2 on clientDa...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- [webauthn] Missing steps of checking pubKeyCredParams during registration step at RP server
- Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side
- [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side
- Re: [webauthn] Adopt consistent case for section headings
- Re: [webauthn] Add Username Enumeration section to privacy considerations
- [w3c/webauthn] 9a99d4: Fix typo
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Update Figure 1 to follow up the spec modification
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- [webauthn] Update Figure 1 to follow up the spec modification
Sunday, 9 September 2018
Friday, 7 September 2018
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] cognitive-accessibility consideration
Thursday, 6 September 2018
Wednesday, 5 September 2018
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Consensus - Web Authentication specification
- Re: Call for Consensus - Web Authentication specification
- Re: [webauthn] About the canonical CBOR encoding form
- Call for Consensus - Web Authentication specification
- Re: [webauthn] About the canonical CBOR encoding form
- Re: [webauthn] Provide transport information during registration.
- Re: [webauthn] About the canonical CBOR encoding form
- Closed: [webauthn] About the canonical CBOR encoding form
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- Re: [webauthn] Add Credential Loss and Key Mobility section to security considerations
- Re: [webauthn] Adopt consistent case for section headings
- Re: [webauthn] Highlight Basic/AttCA ambiguity in definitions and verification procedures
- [w3c/webauthn] e320eb: use 'attacker' instead of 'user'
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: use 'attacker' instead of 'user'
- Re: [webauthn] Add Username Enumeration section to privacy considerations
- Re: [webauthn] Security threat: Username enumeration
- [w3c/webauthn] e320eb: use 'attacker' instead of 'user'
- [webauthn] Pull Request: use 'attacker' instead of 'user'
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by samuelweiler
- [w3c/webauthn] fd0e06: link other occurrances of 'map'
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Add Credential Loss and Key Mobility section to security considerations
- [w3c/webauthn] 397187: Add Credential Loss and Key Mobility section to se...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Editorial: WebAuthn or WebAuthN
- Re: [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct
- [w3c/webauthn] e29dba: Adopt consistent case for section headings
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Adopt consistent case for section headings
- [w3c/webauthn] 7c75d6: Adopt consistent case for section headings
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
Tuesday, 4 September 2018
- 09/05/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
- Re: Summit on Recovering from Device Loss in WebAuthn
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Highlight Basic/AttCA ambiguity in definitions and verification procedures
- [w3c/webauthn] be30a2: Add note about Basic and AttCA being indistinguish...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Pull Request: PR 1052 review suggestion
- [w3c/webauthn] 0686f5: Reword the Note: in User Handle a bit
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Pull Request: fix #403: user handle - account relationship
- [w3c/webauthn] ad6743: fix 403
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH