Re: [webauthn] Privacy section may wish to discuss recommended user-agent responses to leaks

@agl Does this mean that inline [Issue 2][iss] is solved and can be removed?

>ISSUE 2 @balfanz wishes to add to the "direct" case: If the authenticator violates the privacy requirements of the attestation type it is using, the client SHOULD terminate this algorithm with an "AttestationNotPrivateError".

[iss]: https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#issue-62a76e68

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by emlun
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/454#issuecomment-388061234 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 10 May 2018 13:57:49 UTC