- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:13:46 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Having a \<dfn> that is not referenced from elsewhere in the spec is fine by me (on a case-by-case basis) -- it seems harmless, it could be referred to as you @emlun note in user verification steps in the authenticator ops. I'd leave it be for now. -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/833#issuecomment-373080454 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2018 16:13:49 UTC