Re: [webauthn] Specify extension types in listing instead of prose

I like that idea, but on the other hand it might be better to just leave this as is instead of introducing new concepts for this relatively small gain. What do you think?

Or perhaps we could just change the title in the listings from "Extension type" to "Operation applicability" or so (note that an extension can be both a registration extension and an authentication extension), without specifically defining the term.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by emlun
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/941#issuecomment-396223752 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 11 June 2018 12:18:20 UTC