W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [webauthn] capitalize "must" in Note in authenticatorGetAssertion operation

From: Emil Lundberg via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:03:36 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-395412490-1528376615-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

- Possibly the "Optional" in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#public-key-credential-source-otherui
- "optional" in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dom-publickeycredentialrequestoptions-rpid
- "optional" in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dom-publickeycredentialrequestoptions-allowcredentials
- "optional" in `excludeCredentialDescriptorList` in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#op-make-cred
- "optional" in `allowCredentialDescriptorList` in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#op-get-assertion
- Possibly the occurrences of "optional" in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#credentialpublickey
- "optional", the last word in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#sctn-location-extension

There are also these occurrences that probably should not be uppercased:

- "Relying Party script optionally specifies some criteria" in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#getAssertion
- "given the Relying Party's challenge and optional list of credentials it is aware of" and "proving possession of the credential private key, and optionally evidence of user consent to a specific transaction" in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#iface-authenticatorassertionresponse
- "The Relying Party can optionally enforce requirements on authenticators' security properties" in https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#sctn-rp-benefits

...and it looks like there are a bunch more for the other keywords as well.

GitHub Notification of comment by emlun
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/938#issuecomment-395412490 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2018 13:03:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:33 UTC