- From: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 22:17:38 +0000
- To: Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>, W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Locking the repository seems to be problematic as we did that last time, I suggest that we only lock it for non-editors and go from there -----Original Message----- From: Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 3:07 PM To: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org> Subject: RE: lock the webauthn repo? Obviously W3C staff should give their opinions. My view: I would recommend avoiding any technical changes to the document during the new review period. Editorial changes that will not affect declarations (e.g. https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwebauthn%2Fissues%2F1015&data=02%7C01%7Ctonynad%40microsoft.com%7C059bda987e3340f42d1b08d5f3443a10%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636682396710582281&sdata=MaygUw1qfsOQS1z%2FnpWe9uQX%2Bsn61TDR4nwEWc87MKI%3D&reserved=0) can be addressed. Yes, the diffs will change. But I think improving the readability of the spec is worth it. -Giri Mandyam -----Original Message----- From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 2:06 PM To: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org> Subject: lock the webauthn repo? Given that any further merges-to-master will alter any diff rendered by the diff links sent out in the request to update CR messages -- <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fpublic-webauthn%2F2018Jul%2F0558.html&data=02%7C01%7Ctonynad%40microsoft.com%7C059bda987e3340f42d1b08d5f3443a10%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636682396710582281&sdata=MqL5JISLQAfh9zL%2BU3Lxz%2BaV%2F19Hy%2F%2BjfIwHeTnnDmg%3D&reserved=0> and <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fpublic-webauthn%2F2018Jul%2F0559.html&data=02%7C01%7Ctonynad%40microsoft.com%7C059bda987e3340f42d1b08d5f3443a10%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636682396710582281&sdata=Y9FGss%2FWM5Skjx0a8ebapLIoIC2HVO2CjKmXB90HQFM%3D&reserved=0> -- should we lock the repo during the review period? though it appears the review lasts until 2018 08 30, so that's kinda a long time. =JeffH
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2018 22:18:06 UTC