Re: Consensus on CR revision of WebAuthn

Quoting John Fontana <jfontana@yubico.com>:

> The WebAuthn working group ​w​ill revise its Candidate  
> Recommendation. The chairs believe the group has consensus to  
> publish the current editor's draft based on working group  
> discussions that unfortunately were not ​captured in
> the minutes.

I spose the important detail is "how do we define the current editor's  
draft?", i.e., which commit are we going to tag as "CR-candidate"?

We have four open PRs:

<https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3APropRec>


..as well as 24 issues lacking open PRs, a few of which are technical:

<https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is:open+is:issue+milestone:PropRec++-label:stat:pr-open+>


So are we going to at least review and merge the currently-open PRs?


=JeffH

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2018 22:47:57 UTC