Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute

I've asked @jyasskin to weigh in. However, I'm not sure that the lack of optional members is a problem here. This is the browser's extension output, thus the structure only contains fields for extensions that the browser supports. It's typical for browsers that don't support something not to have certain fields (I think). For example, we suggest testing for `window.PublicKeyCredential` to tell whether webauthn is supported or not.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by agl
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/810#issuecomment-367785770 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 19:04:14 UTC