> Credential IDs are not guaranteed unique in any way. Unless I missed > something in the specs, it is perfectly valid to store all data locally and > return a single byte key index. Then, I believe I've missed something important here. The credential ID must be a unique identifier, just like the U2F key handle. We make the CTAP2 credential ID equal to the U2F key handle, so a U2F credential can be used with WebAuthN and vice-versa. For resident credentials, we generate a credential ID from the public key, making this a 128-bit identifier. Did I ge this wrong ?Received on Thursday, 21 September 2017 18:13:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:27 UTC