Re: [webauthn] basicIntegrity in SafetyNet documentation not sufficiently defined

@selfissued 

This is exactly what I am doing - asking for the missing information from the Google 'specification'.  Note that there is no official liaison relationship defined between the W3C and Google, so I don't see any official way to request the missing information other than on the repo.  

Regarding "commonly-used", what criteria are you using to make this determination?  As far as I can tell, Android O attestation will form the basis for FIDO 2.0.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by gmandyam
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/437#issuecomment-327952586 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 23:16:44 UTC