- From: Emil Lundberg via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:49:01 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
I'm not sure having Privacy CA as a separate attestation type is very meaningful, as like you say (and @balfanz notes in https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/628#issue-264709581), to the RP it looks and act the same as Basic Attestation. I would suggest merging the two concepts, but I'm not sure how that would affect the TPM attestation statement format which seems to be intimately connected to the Privacy CA model. -- GitHub Notification of comment by emlun Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/656#issuecomment-337842187 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 08:49:02 UTC