Re: [webauthn] Packed and U2F Attestation Statements' verifications don't differentiate between Basic and Privacy CA Attestation Types

I'm not sure having Privacy CA as a separate attestation type is very meaningful, as like you say (and @balfanz notes in, to the RP it looks and act the same as Basic Attestation. I would suggest merging the two concepts, but I'm not sure how that would affect the TPM attestation statement format which seems to be intimately connected to the Privacy CA model.

GitHub Notification of comment by emlun
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 08:49:02 UTC