@emlun wrote: > With #635 merged, can we close this? well, if the re-formulation of step 10 given in https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/561#issuecomment-328684717 is not itself incorrect, I would be inclined to use it because not everyone is as smart as @emlun :) and the current statement in step 10 that "attStmt is a correct, validly-signed attestation statement" is misleading. If the re-formulation of step 10 is correct (someone please review it?), then it is a simple cut-and-paste. I re-reviewing, I now would make the 2nd proposed sentence a "Note:". -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/561#issuecomment-336965301 using your GitHub accountReceived on Monday, 16 October 2017 17:40:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:28 UTC