- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:19:57 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
@ve7jtb said: > We should stop calling this a privacy CA. It is a attestation proxy... Actually, the TCG now terms it an "attestation CA" (see issue #610), tho one can argue that the latter is a TCG-specific name. IIUC, what @balfanz et al are imagining would not actually impl the TCG-specified attestation CA protocol tho would be similar. Perhaps the "attestation proxy" is a good name in order to avoid confusion with the legacy privacy CA (tcg-specific) name. -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/628#issuecomment-335965456 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2017 22:19:45 UTC