>Currently the PublicKeyCredentialEntity has no required members, and it appears to be acceptable to pass an empty object to publicKey.rp. Was that the intent? This looks like an editorial mistake. [§4.4][rp] specifies that `rp.name` is required. >Same concern for PublicKeyCredentialUserEntity, which also doesn't seem to have any meaningful information (such as an id for the user). That type inherits `id` in the 2017-08-11 draft. In the 2017-09-28 draft the property has been moved down, and is also specified in [§4.4][user] to be required. [rp]: https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dom-makepublickeycredentialoptions-rp [user]: https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dom-makepublickeycredentialoptions-user -- GitHub Notification of comment by emlun Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/587#issuecomment-333815317 using your GitHub accountReceived on Tuesday, 3 October 2017 11:34:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:28 UTC