Re: [webauthn] build on Adding a choice for RP to express preferences for attestation types

@emlun wrote:
> We could perhaps forbid authenticators from using a none attestation statement format, but it could definitely be confusing.

@agl had said:
> Adding a "none" attestation format might be interesting in the future...

Yeah. I'm thinking that at this time we not define a "none" attstn stmt format. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/693#issuecomment-346429491 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2017 18:02:38 UTC