Re: [webauthn] build on Adding a choice for RP to express preferences for attestation types

@agl wrote:
> gitk shows that the relationship between this and balfanz-patch-4 is complex. 

yep.

> Does this not include & subsume the latter? I.e. why not land this and abandon balfanz-patch-4?

yep, that's an option. what do folks think? @balfanz ?   (I've adapted the language from the latest commit 825cce7 to PR #636)





-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/693#issuecomment-345492272 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 19 November 2017 04:57:12 UTC