Re: [webauthn] Why are various predefined extensions defined as extensions, and not just parts of the spec?

As we discussed in the F2F, it's a business decision which extensions to support.  They're extensions because supporting them is optional.

FYI, should make it a lot clearer how to define and register new extensions.  It makes it clear that the initially defined ones are not somehow "special".

GitHub Notification of comment by selfissued
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2017 23:58:31 UTC