Re: [webauthn] Define extension client processing more carefully.

@vijaybh suggested here 
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/347/files#diff-ec9cfa5f3f35ec1f84feb2e59686c34dR496:
I think we should base64url encode those just as we do with the 
challenge. Need to update client processing sections of extensions, 
maybe this should be part of #363.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/363#issuecomment-283725596 
using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 2 March 2017 17:44:59 UTC