Re: [webauthn] Drop UAF references in favor of better explanation

@bifurcation wrote:
> {#sctn-attestation-types} is about explaining different ways to do 
attestation while still being privacy-preserving.  The section should 
be clearer about its purpose ("Attestation Models"?) and explain 
directly how these models work and protect privacy, instead of by 
reference to UAF.

I think this issue is largely addressed, e.g. the term "attestation 
models" is gone. Tho I feel that the cites of [UAFProtocol] ought to 
remain. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/217#issuecomment-283521775 
using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 2 March 2017 00:56:33 UTC