- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:03:51 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
@kpaulh wrote: > As an example use case, a user logs in to the RP. If the call is successful.. This is assuming that the login is a legacy one (e.g. via [form-based ("password") authentication](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form-based_authentication)) not using WebAuthn/FIDO means, yes? > ..the browser would drop an info bar / bubble that informs capable users of the RP's ability to use the authenticator for log-in.. By "the authenticator" do you mean to say "an available platform authenticator"? During the discussion at the end of the F2F meeting I recall that roaming authenticators (i.e., those with a cross-platform attachment) were not considered candidates for this use case -- is that still the intention? Also, this use case depends upon the RP webapp developers to explicitly take advantage of the availability of this method and to weave it properly into their login flows, yes? If they do not do so, then perhaps there is still need for possibly throwing a "NotFoundError" as anticipated in #302 and #350 ? @vijaybh ? -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/345#issuecomment-282360559 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 24 February 2017 18:03:59 UTC