Re: U2F to WebAuthn (as of Vijay's PR)

Notably missing is the value we'd give to counter.  Maybe we just pick 0?
The U2F spec monotonically increasing, so if we set it to 0, that should be
fine for all U2F authenticators... I think...


Thanks!
-Alexei

*____**_**__**_**_**_**_**_**_**_**_**_*

 . Alexei Czeskis .:. Securineer .:. 317.698.4740 .

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Alexei Czeskis <aczeskis@google.com>
wrote:

> Here is a sketch of how the browser would shoehorn the current U2F
> response into the WebAuthn attestation object proposed by Vijay in PR 321.
>
> Thanks!
> -Alexei
>
> *____**_**__**_**_**_**_**_**_**_**_**_*
>
>  . Alexei Czeskis .:. Securineer .:. 317.698.4740 <(317)%20698-4740> .
>