Re: [webauthn] "rp" isn't a widely enough known acronym?, should be relyingParting instead?

RP is very widely known but I have no issue with relyingParty except 
the verboseness 

GitHub Notification of comment by nadalin
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2017 22:07:25 UTC