W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > December 2017

Re: [webauthn] #420: Add note on why authenticator attachment is used only in create()

From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:13:18 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-349743785-1512587597-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Reviewed: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/708#pullrequestreview-81634828
LGTM. Thanks @emlun!

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/708#issuecomment-349743785 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2017 19:13:19 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: =JeffH via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Update session management for BT"
Previous message: J.C. Jones via GitHub: "Closed: [webauthn] Extension identifiers in examples are inconsistent with registered identifiers"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Adam Langley via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] #420: Add note on why authenticator attachment is used only in create()"
Maybe reply: Adam Langley via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] #420: Add note on why authenticator attachment is used only in create()"
Maybe reply: Akshay Kumar via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] #420: Add note on why authenticator attachment is used only in create()"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:30 UTC