Re: [webauthn] Why was PR #409 (UV bit) merged?

> I don't know how you would know UV is performed without this bit in.

We should add it to the attestation -- that this type of authenticator is the kind that verifies the user :)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by leshi
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/424#issuecomment-296847608 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 23:14:46 UTC