- From: Angelo Liao <huliao@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:48:56 +0000
- To: "public-webauthn@w3.org" <public-webauthn@w3.org>
- CC: Adam Powers <adam@fidoalliance.org>
- Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB2769CEA5067984E2F3FEAFB3D7180@BN6PR03MB2769.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Everyone, The longstanding PR 384<https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/384> was merged about an hour ago ☺. As we discussed on the call, there are 4 PRs we are waiting before WD-05 can be ready. Here is how I’d rank as priority based on two principles: 1) CTAP comes first, then implementation, and finally editorial works, and 2) readiness of the PR. I hope you may review the PRs in this order. 1. PR 409: Add Test of User Identity (TUI) bit to authenticator data<https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/409> 2. PR 378: Enable RP to choose authenticators based on key storage capability<https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/378> * This is the related use case classification: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/334. 3. PR 350: Throw NotFoundError when no authenticator is available <https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/350> * This would works implementation-wise. 2 lines of code are change here. Even though I don’t care much about this one, I figure we should take a look at it. 4. PR 389: Separated proposed changes to extension semantics from PR #386 and use TypeError, per @jyasskin <https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/389> * In a chat after the call this morning, MikeJ suggested if this PR is blocking WD-05, he’s ok with dropping this PR from WD-05. Thank you everyone for your work in this WG! Special thanks to MikeW and JeffH for your works in PR 384<https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/384> ☺ Angelo
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:49:38 UTC