Re: [webauthn] do not totally lose the term "WebAuthn Relying Party"

to expand on @selfissued's thoughts, note that we ought to go through and make all `[RP]` and `[RPS]` occurrences to be `[=[RP]=]` etc. and we can add "webauthn relying party" appropriately in the terminology section and make equivalent to Relying Party, and also say that, in this specification, this is sometimes shortened to just "Relying Party" or "RP".

GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 7 April 2017 20:21:07 UTC