- From: Mike Jones via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 01:36:23 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
In some cases, it's fine to explicitly say that longer and shorter names are used equivalently in the specification, for instance, saying that "WebAuthn Relying Party", "Relying Party", and "RP" are equivalent as used in this specification. It seems to me like all of these are editorial issues and not names used in APIs. If this is the case, we should change it from being tagged as "Technical" to "Editorial". Any API changes resulting from this issue need to be decided before the Implementer's Draft. -- GitHub Notification of comment by selfissued Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/358#issuecomment-291705459 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2017 01:36:29 UTC