- From: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:20 -0700
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
- Message-ID: <57c84ba88cadc_27e13fe42fbe913492395@hookshot-fe5-cp1-prd.iad.github.net.mail>
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn
Commit: b6a2790a029263f3b5763e8d76771e57c1dadde3
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/commit/b6a2790a029263f3b5763e8d76771e57c1dadde3
Author: Rahul Ghosh <rdghosh@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-09-01 (Thu, 01 Sep 2016)
Changed paths:
M index.bs
Log Message:
-----------
Adding the User Verification Mode extension as per discussions in the⦠(#169)
* Adding the User Verification Mode extension as per discussions in the WG weekly metings. After a lot of thought I retained the sub-array instead of converting the sub-items in the extension to a map. This was primarily to avoid having to define string based keys that increases the size of the extension. Given that the array is well defined I think it keeps it easier to process in software and extendable for future additions as well.
* Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (#154)
* Replace facet with origin
Facet was a holdover from the old FIDO specs and origin is the term used
everywhere in this spec (as well as in recent FIDO specs)
* Clean up explanation of computing clientDataHash and passing to authenticator
Fixes #153
* Remove text from authnsel extension to avoid chicken-and-egg problem
Fixes #152
* Address comments from @equalsJeffH
* Update index.bs with proposed location extension (#157)
* Update index.bs
* Update index.bs
* Update index.bs
* Update index.bs
* Adding the User Verification Mode extension as per discussions in the WG weekly metings. After a lot of thought I retained the sub-array instead of converting the sub-items in the extension to a map. This was primarily to avoid having to define string based keys that increases the size of the extension. Given that the array is well defined I think it keeps it easier to process in software and extendable for future additions as well.
* fixing another merge issue with uvm extension being repeated following upstream merge
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2016 15:39:57 UTC