W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [webauthn] "If extensions was specified" should instead use the "present" terminology

From: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:29:02 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-258552236-1478294941-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

This applies to https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#getAssertion step 4 
too.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by bzbarsky
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/269#issuecomment-258552236 
using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 4 November 2016 21:29:08 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Processing model for extensions is very underdefined"
Previous message: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Please coordinate with the HTML spec to extract the relevant bits of the document.domain setter so you can call them"
In reply to: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "[webauthn] "If extensions was specified" should instead use the "present" terminology"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:23 UTC