public-webauthn@w3.org from May 2016 by date

Tuesday, 31 May 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] b073bf: fix spelling and reference GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• Call for Exclusions: Web Authentication: A Web API for accessing scoped credentials Xueyuan Jia

Saturday, 28 May 2016

• wrt client filtering of extensions (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Hodges, Jeff

Friday, 27 May 2016

• Re: extensions, continued.. (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Hodges, Jeff
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary J.C. Jones
• RE: extensions, continued.. (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: extensions, continued.. (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Hodges, Jeff
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary J.C. Jones
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary J.C. Jones
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Wendy Seltzer
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary J.C. Jones
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Mandyam, Giridhar
• RE: Blog post for FPWD announcement Mike Jones
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Sampath Srinivas
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Mandyam, Giridhar
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Sampath Srinivas
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Anthony Nadalin
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Mandyam, Giridhar
• [w3c/webauthn] 46784e: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD (#110) GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 16df16: address vijay's comments #3 - minor tweaks GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• FPWD & blog post staged for publication Samuel Weiler
• use cases Dirk Balfanz
• Blog post for FWPD announcement Mike Jones

Thursday, 26 May 2016

• Re: github notifications setup for w3c/webauthn? Hodges, Jeff
• RE: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: if you read mail via gmail, please check.. jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary Anthony Nadalin
• Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. Hodges, Jeff
• Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: github notifications setup for w3c/webauthn? Wendy Seltzer
• Re: github notifications setup for w3c/webauthn? Hodges, Jeff
• [w3c/webauthn] 6a6014: address Vijay's comments GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ef90dc: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 46784e: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD (#110) GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] [5 second review] Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• RE: Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW Vijay Bharadwaj

Wednesday, 25 May 2016

• RE: PR#109: Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] bfe17b: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD GitHub
• RE: Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW Mike Jones
• Re: Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW Hodges, Jeff
• Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW Mike Jones
• Re: PR#109: Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• [minutes] Re: 05/25/2006 W3C WebAuthn WG Agenda Wendy Seltzer
• Re: How to create an IANA registry and populate it from non-IETF specs Samuel Weiler
• RE: regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions" Mandyam, Giridhar
• regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions" jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions" Richard Barnes
• regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions" Hodges, Jeff
• How to create an IANA registry and populate it from non-IETF specs jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com

Tuesday, 24 May 2016

• if you read mail via gmail, please check.. jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: Thanks very much to Tony and Microsoft... Sampath Srinivas
• Re: Thanks very much to Tony and Microsoft... John Fontana
• Thanks very much to Tony and Microsoft... jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• 05/25/2006 W3C WebAuthn WG Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• RE: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) Anthony Nadalin
• Re: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) Hodges, Jeff
• PR#109: Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• RE: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) Vijay Bharadwaj

Monday, 23 May 2016

• RE: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) Mike Jones
• Re: [webauthn] Lots of FPWD issues =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] web-api: is further language needed describing AppID (aka rpId) usage ? =JeffH via GitHub
• RE: of shortnames and the /TR namespace Mike Jones
• Re: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) Hodges, Jeff
• Re: of shortnames and the /TR namespace Hodges, Jeff
• Re: of shortnames and the /TR namespace Richard Barnes
• Re: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) Adam Powers
• Re: of shortnames and the /TR namespace Wendy Seltzer
• of shortnames and the /TR namespace Hodges, Jeff
• Re: Call for Consensus: Publish FPWD Richard Barnes
• Re: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) J.C. Jones
• Re: Notes from WebAuthn Review Hodges, Jeff

Sunday, 22 May 2016

• RE: Notes from WebAuthn Review Adam Powers

Saturday, 21 May 2016

• Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: Notes from WebAuthn Review Vijay Bharadwaj
• Notes from WebAuthn Review Adam Powers
• [w3c/webauthn] 600b0b: remove Makefile dependency on biblio.json GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f520b5: publishing diff GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 061201: Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/... GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Terminology consistency =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify which sign. algm.'s RP's must support (Sec. 4.3.2.1.2) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Section 4.3: add reference to privacy =JeffH via GitHub

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

• Re: Cancel call today? Richard Barnes
• Re: Cancel call today? Hodges, Jeff
• RE: Cancel call today? Mandyam, Giridhar
• RE: Cancel call today? Anthony Nadalin
• Cancel call today? Richard Barnes

Saturday, 14 May 2016

• [minutes] 13 May F2F Wendy Seltzer
• Re: Call for Consensus: Publish FPWD jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com

Friday, 13 May 2016

• Fwd: TPAC 2016 Registration Now Open -- Webauthn set to meet Tuesday, Sept. 20 Wendy Seltzer W3C
• [webauthn] Issue: Remove attestation specification from spec marked as type:technical Alexei Czeskis via GitHub
• [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec Alexei Czeskis via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Clarify which sign. algm.'s RP's must support (Sec. 4.3.2.1.2) marked as type:editorial =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Clarify when an extension may be ignored by user agent marked as type:editorial =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Add opaque data extension marked as type:technical =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Create an Explainer document marked as type:editorial =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Underspecified error conditions marked as type:technical =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] AAGUID extension underspecified Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] The FIDO Metadata Service needs a non-FIDO analogous mechanism Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] ED512 Support Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] ED512 Support Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Structure of Credential ID Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Structure of Credential ID Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Define AuthenticatorVersion extension Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Define AuthenticatorVersion extension Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Key-Attestation: no point compression in the Packed attestation Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Key-Attestation: no point compression in the Packed attestation Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system marked as duplicate Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Authentication failure due to inactivity Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: Authentication failure due to inactivity Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: add userID as input parameter in authenticatorGetAssertion Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: add userID as input parameter in authenticatorGetAssertion Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: Test Plan Development Richard Barnes
• Re: [webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server Johan Verrept via GitHub
• Re: Test Plan Development Adam Powers
• Re: Test Plan Development Richard Barnes
• [webauthn] Issue: Document wide review marked as type:process Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• Call for Consensus: Publish FPWD Richard Barnes
• Re: [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Test Plan Development Adam Powers
• Draft Webauthn registration figure -- review please jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context Alexei Czeskis via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context marked as spec:signature-format Alexei Czeskis via GitHub
• [webauthn] Document wide review Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 17efea: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 5f6c59: Update README.md GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 09bc41: Update README.md GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 58c350: add link to test repo GitHub
• Re: Webauthn Tests Wendy Seltzer
• [webauthn] Issue: clarify returned values from authenticatorMakeCredential operation marked as spec:web-api-sig-fmt-et-al =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] clarify returned values from authenticatorMakeCredential operation =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Create an Explainer document J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. Alexei Czeskis via GitHub
• [webauthn] Clarify which sign. algm.'s RP's must support (Sec. 4.3.2.1.2) gmandyam via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Add Android "N" attestation type. marked as type:technical Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Add section describing verification of a WebAuthnAssertion Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Add section describing verification of a WebAuthnAssertion marked as type:technical Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. marked as type:technical Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Section 4.3: add reference to privacy marked as type:editorial Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Section 4.3: add reference to privacy Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used marked as type:editorial Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] Add opaque data extension gmandyam via GitHub
• [webauthn] Clarify when an extension may be ignored by user agent gmandyam via GitHub

Thursday, 12 May 2016

• [webauthn] Issue: Privacy across OS accounts marked as stat:Discuss levangongPayPal via GitHub
• [webauthn] Privacy across OS accounts levangongPayPal via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Authenticator Selection Extension - Client Processing - Clarification marked as stat:Discuss levangongPayPal via GitHub
• [webauthn] Authenticator Selection Extension - Client Processing - Clarification levangongPayPal via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: Clarification of assertion delivery in platform specific manner Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: clarification of FIDOWebAPI scope Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] key-attestation: S 2.3 "attestation types" -- move into S 2.1 "attestation models" ? Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Credential Identifier scope Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: clarify conveyance of attested public key marked as stat:Discuss =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] clarify conveyance of attested public key =JeffH via GitHub
• Web Authentication F2F meeting: Tomorrow, May 13, Berlin Wendy Seltzer
• [w3c/webauthn] 8d3761: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 0950a1: Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful... GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? J.C. Jones
• RE: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• [webauthn] Issue: move biblio.js into in-line <pre class=biblio> block marked as spec:web-api-sig-fmt-et-al =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] move biblio.js into in-line <pre class=biblio> block =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Create an Explainer document Michael[tm] Smith via GitHub

Wednesday, 11 May 2016

• RE: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] 970210: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 15e1b9: Lots of FPWD issues (#83) GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Registration (embedded authenticator mode) use cases assumptions Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: Question on FIDO 2.0 layers Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] key-attestation: lacks explanation of "attestation" Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] authenticatorMakeCredential and authenticatorGetAssertion parameters not uniformly specified Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] TAG review comments on eTLD+1 Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Credential.id currently assumed to be RP unique Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Clarification Credential Type Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Clarify that extensions are optional and may not be supported Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Lots of FPWD issues Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Lots of FPWD issues =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] SigFormat: Clarification of assertion delivery in platform specific manner =JeffH via GitHub

Tuesday, 10 May 2016

• Re: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? Wendy Seltzer
• Closed: [webauthn] tgbbn Adam Powers via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] tgbbnccccccevjdnfkufcdnulgkllldgvjrltediuknnjejbj Adam Powers via GitHub
• [webauthn] tgbbnccccccevjdnfkufcdnulgkllldgvjrltediuknnjejbj Adam Powers via GitHub
• [webauthn] tgbbn Adam Powers via GitHub
• reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: [webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server Adam Powers via GitHub
• [webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server Alexei Czeskis via GitHub
• Diff of vijaybh/lots-of-fpwd-issues branch from master branch jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• [webauthn] Issue: Scoped credentials represent a relationship between user and RP marked as spec:web-api levangongPayPal via GitHub
• [webauthn] Scoped credentials represent a relationship between user and RP levangongPayPal via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a8a2d7: JsonWebKey is a dictionary not an interface GitHub
• Register for next F2F after May 13th Berlin: Sept 20th at TPAC Lisbon Harry Halpin

Sunday, 8 May 2016

• Re: [webauthn] ScopedCredentialInfo attestation Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] ScopedCredentialInfo attestation Adam Powers via GitHub
• [webauthn] assertionChallenge recommendations Adam Powers via GitHub
• RE: Three possibilities for discussion Vijay Bharadwaj
• [webauthn] Move optional parameters and extensions into an "options" dictionary Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: Three possibilities for discussion Alexei Czeskis

Saturday, 7 May 2016

• Re: updating milestone labels Wendy Seltzer
• RE: Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] c112c9: Clarify security model and remove vestiges of "nat... GitHub
• Re: updating milestone labels jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: updating milestone labels Wendy Seltzer

Friday, 6 May 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 827a63: Use case: user can use WebAuthn credential when cr... GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] b5493f: Make method parameters consistent between API and ... GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c5b321: Clarify attestation model vs. attestation type GitHub
• updating milestone labels jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming Hodges, Jeff
• RE: Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming Vijay Bharadwaj
• Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming Vijay Bharadwaj
• Closed: [webauthn] Rename WebAuthnAssertion / getAssertion Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Rename WebAuthnAssertion / getAssertion Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] cd4e78: Simplify attestation structure by moving details i... GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] d14fec: Clarify credential type GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Verification of publicKey missing in section 3.5 Verifying an Attestation Statement Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Verification of publicKey missing in section 3.5 Verifying an Attestation Statement Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] bd6264: Clarify that extensions are optional GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Should a FIDOAssertion on an Android platform use AndroidAttestationClientData? Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should a FIDOAssertion on an Android platform use AndroidAttestationClientData? Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] encodedClientData should be clientDataJSON ? Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] encodedClientData should be clientDataJSON ? Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b... GitHub
• Re: Webauthn Tests Adam Powers
• Re: Webauthn Tests Richard Barnes
• Re: Webauthn Tests Harry Halpin
• [w3c/webauthn] fe40b5: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• Webauthn Tests Adam Powers
• [w3c/webauthn] 49d6ba: Replace TPM hyperlinks with working ones (#82) GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a38ee2: Clarify that RP ID is globally unique GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 66372a: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404 Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404 Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Abstraction layer for attestations Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

Thursday, 5 May 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] cefc6f: Replace TPM hyperlinks with working ones GitHub
• 5/11 W3C Web Authentication Meeting Anthony Nadalin
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model James 'J.C.' Jones via GitHub

Wednesday, 4 May 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] c56539: fix formatting GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 1be2d8: Fix formatting in F2F meeting agenda GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 32994f: Create 2016-05-13-Berlin-f2f.md GitHub
• Re: Proposed F2F agenda Wendy Seltzer
• [w3c/webauthn] c830a9: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: Credential.id currently assumed to be RP unique marked as stat:OKtoDo bifurcation via GitHub
• RE: Proposed F2F agenda Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: Proposed F2F agenda Richard Barnes
• Proposed F2F agenda Richard Barnes
• [w3c/webauthn] 5aa4d7: Incorporate feedback from JeffH, fix an incorrect ... GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 53d985: Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections (#81) GitHub
• Re: Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin Wendy Seltzer
• RE: [w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b... Mike Jones
• [w3c/webauthn] 212d61: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 53d985: Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections (#81) GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Tuesday, 3 May 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b... GitHub
• Re: Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin Alexei Czeskis
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model =JeffH via GitHub
• RE: Simplifying Android attestation Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] d1fb5f: Simplify Android attestation by removing manipulat... GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model Hodges, Jeff
• Re: Simplifying Android attestation Alexei Czeskis
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model Alexei Czeskis via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] da3117: Rebasing to master after merge of PR#77 GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 79afe1: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model Hodges, Jeff
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b... GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Should we be using array types instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings? Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• RE: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: Simplifying Android attestation Alexei Czeskis
• Re: Simplifying Android attestation =JeffH
• Re: Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin Wendy Seltzer
• Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings James 'J.C.' Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] adopt consistent terms for RP server-side and client-side components =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin Anthony Nadalin
• Simplifying Android attestation Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: Issues #1 and #61 Vijay Bharadwaj
• Issues #1 and #61 Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: [webauthn] normalizing term(s) for authenticator-generated RP-specific public key Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] normalizing term(s) for authenticator-generated RP-specific public key =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Issue: normalizing term(s) for authenticator-generated RP-specific public key marked as type:editorial =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404 =JeffH via GitHub

Monday, 2 May 2016

• user authn public key duplicated in ScopedCredentialInfo and AttestationStatement (rawData) ? jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• [webauthn] Issue: biblio.json: TPM refs 404 marked as type:editorial =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404 =JeffH via GitHub

Sunday, 1 May 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 4fbfa4: Clarify Android attestation procedure GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 19f23b: Remove base64 from packed and TPM attestation form... GitHub

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2016 22:24:19 UTC