- From: Hodges, Jeff <jeff.hodges@paypal.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:30:02 +0000
- To: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Here's an initial cut at an internet-draft creating WebAuthn registries at
IANA. It is somewhat based upon RFC5988 by Mark Nottingham.
I spose we ought to use the issue tracker on this too so I created a new
issue label for it - "spec:webauthn-registries".
There are some issues noted inline, not all of which are submitted into
the issues list because there may be obvious resolutions based on prior
experience of reviewers. if not, then we can enter 'em and track 'em.
review encouraged, HTH,
=JeffH
Network Working Group J. Hodges
Internet-Draft PayPal
Intended status: Informational June 13, 2016
Expires: December 15, 2016
The Profile URI Registry
draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-00
Abstract
This specification defines IANA registries for W3C Web Authentication
(WebAuthn) attestation types and extension identifiers.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 15, 2016.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. IANA Considerations
2.1. WebAuthn Attestation Types Registry
2.1.1. Registering New WebAuthn Attestation Types
2.1.2. Example WebAuthn Attestation Type Registration
Request
2.1.3. Initial Registry Contents
2.2. WebAuthn Extension Identifiers Registry
2.2.1. Registering New WebAuthn Extension Identifiers
2.2.2. Example WebAuthn Extension Identifier Registration
Request
2.2.3. Initial Registry Contents
3. Security Considerations
4. Change Log
5. Acknowledgements
6. Normative References
Author's Address
1. Introduction
This specification defines IANA registries for W3C Web Authentication
[WebAuthn] attestation types and extension identifiers, and supplies
initial entries within each registry.
2. IANA Considerations
2.1. WebAuthn Attestation Types Registry
This specification establishes the WebAuthn Attestation Types
registry [WebAuthn]. The IANA registration policy is "Specification
Required" per [RFC5226]. Instructions, and a request template, for a
registrant to request the registration of a new WebAuthn Attestation
Type are in Section 2.1.1. An example registration request is given
in Section 2.1.2. The initial registry contents are given in
Section 2.1.3.
The underlying registry data (e.g., the XML file) must include
Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust
Legal Provisions (<http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info>).
2.1.1. Registering New WebAuthn Attestation Types
WebAuthn Attestation Types are registered per the IANA registration
policy of "Specification Required" [RFC5226], which implies use of a
Designated Expert (appointed by the IESG (?) (W3C Team?) or their
delegate).
[[ISSUE: Who ought to appoint the DE and adjudicate any appeals?
IESG (?) or W3C Team? (appeals process is described below, presently
in terms of IESG)]]
WebAuthn attestation type identifiers are strings whose semantic,
syntactic, uniqueness, and string-matching criteria are specified in
[WebAuthn].
[[ISSUES: <https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/126>,
<https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/127>]]
Registration requests consist of the completed registration template,
given below, typically published in a W3C Recommendation, or RFC, or
other Open Standard (in the sense described by [RFC2026], Section 7),
and also submitted via email per the next paragraph. However, to
allow for the allocation of values prior to publication, the
Designated Expert may approve registration once they are satisfied
that a specification will be published.
Registration requests should be sent to the <public-webauthn@w3.org>
mailing list, marked clearly in the subject line (e.g., "NEW WEBAUTHN
ATTESTATION TYPE: example" to register an "example" WebAuthn
attestation type).
Within at most 14 days of the request, the Designated Expert(s) will
either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this
decision to the above mailing list and IANA. Denials should include
an explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the
request successful.
Decisions (or lack thereof) made by the Designated Expert can be
first appealed to Application Area Directors (contactable using app-
ads@tools.ietf.org email address or directly by looking up their
email addresses on http://www.iesg.org/ website) and, if the
appellant is not satisfied with the response, to the full IESG (using
the iesg@iesg.org mailing list).
IANA should only accept registry updates from the Designated
Expert(s), and should direct all requests for registration to the
above mailing list.
The registration template is:
o WebAuthn Attestation Type: A unique string identifying the
attestation type.
o Description: A relatively short description of the attestation
type.
o Specification Document: Reference to the specification of the
attestation type.
o Notes: [optional]
2.1.2. Example WebAuthn Attestation Type Registration Request
The following is an example registration request for a WebAuthn
Attestation Type:
This is a request to IANA to please register the "foobar" WebAuthn
Attestation Type in the WebAuthn Attestation Types Registry
according to [this document]:
WebAuthn Attestation Type: FooBar
Description: An example FooBar registration.
Specification Document: <An unambiguous reference to [FooBar
Specification]>
2.1.3. Initial Registry Contents
The WebAuthn Attestation Types registry's initial contents are:
WebAuthn Attestation Type: packed
Description: The "packed" attestation type is a WebAuthn-optimized
format for attestation data. It uses a very compact but still
extensible encoding method. This format is implementable by
authenticators with limited resources (e.g., secure elements).
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
WebAuthn Attestation Type: tpm
Description: The TPM attestation type returns an attestation
statement in the same format as the packed attestation type,
although the the rawData and signature fields are computed
differently.
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
WebAuthn Attestation Type: android
Description: Android-based, platform-provided authenticators may
produce an attestation statement based on the Android SafetyNet
API.
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
WebAuthn Attestation Type: android2
Description: Platform-provided authenticators based on Android
versions "N", and later, may provide a "hardware attestation"
statement.
Specification Document: [AndroidHWAttstn]
2.2. WebAuthn Extension Identifiers Registry
This specification establishes the WebAuthn Extension Identifiers
registry [WebAuthn]. The IANA registration policy is "Specification
Required" per [RFC5226]. Instructions, and a request template, for a
registrant to request the registration of a new WebAuthn Attestation
Type are in Section 2.2.1. An example registration request is given
in Section 2.2.2. The initial registry contents are given in
Section 2.2.3.
The underlying registry data (e.g., the XML file) must include
Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust
Legal Provisions (<http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info>).
2.2.1. Registering New WebAuthn Extension Identifiers
WebAuthn Extension Identifiers are registered per the IANA
registration policy of "Specification Required" [RFC5226], which
implies use of a Designated Expert (appointed by the IESG (?) (W3C
Team?) or their delegate).
[[ISSUE: Who ought to appoint the DE and adjudicate any appeals?
IESG (?) or W3C Team? (appeals process is described below, presently
in terms of IESG)]]
WebAuthn Extension Identifiers are strings whose semantic, syntactic,
uniqueness, and string-matching criteria are specified in [WebAuthn],
specifically <https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/#extension-id>.
[[ISSUE: <https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/129>]]
Registration requests consist of the completed registration template,
given below, typically published in a W3C Recommendation, or RFC, or
other Open Standard (in the sense described by [RFC2026], Section 7),
and also submitted via email per the next paragraph. However, to
allow for the allocation of values prior to publication, the
Designated Expert may approve registration once they are satisfied
that a specification will be published.
Registration requests should be sent to the <public-webauthn@w3.org>
mailing list, marked clearly in the subject line (e.g., "NEW WEBAUTHN
EXTENSION ID: example" to register an "example" WebAuthn extension
identifier).
Within at most 14 days of the request, the Designated Expert(s) will
either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this
decision to the above mailing list and IANA. Denials should include
an explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the
request successful.
Decisions (or lack thereof) made by the Designated Expert can be
first appealed to Application Area Directors (contactable using app-
ads@tools.ietf.org email address or directly by looking up their
email addresses on http://www.iesg.org/ website) and, if the
appellant is not satisfied with the response, to the full IESG (using
the iesg@iesg.org mailing list).
IANA should only accept registry updates from the Designated
Expert(s), and should direct all requests for registration to the
above mailing list.
The registration template is:
o WebAuthn Extension Identifier: A unique string identifying the
extension.
o Description: A relatively short description of the extension.
o Specification Document: Reference to the specification of the
extension.
o Notes: [optional]
2.2.2. Example WebAuthn Extension Identifier Registration Request
The following is an example registration request for a WebAuthn
Extension Identifier:
This is a request to IANA to please register the "BarFoo" WebAuthn
Extension Identifier in the WebAuthn Extension Identifiers
Registry according to [this document]:
WebAuthn Extension Identifier: BarFoo
Description: An example BarFoo registration.
Specification Document: <An unambiguous reference to [BarFoo
Specification]>
2.2.3. Initial Registry Contents
The WebAuthn Extension Identifiers registry's initial contents are:
WebAuthn Extension Identifier: webauthn.txauth.simple
Description: This signature extension allows for a simple form of
transaction authorization. A WebAuthn Relying Party can specify a
prompt string, intended for display on a trusted device on the
authenticator
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
WebAuthn Extension Identifier: webauthn.txauth.generic
Description: This generic txauth extension allows images to be
used as prompts as well. This allows authenticators without a
font rendering engine to be used and also supports a richer visual
appearance than accomplished with the webauthn.txauth.simple
extension.
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
WebAuthn Extension Identifier: webauthn.authn-sel
Description: This registration extension allows a WebAuthn Relying
Party to guide the selection of the authenticator that will be
leveraged when creating the credential. It is intended primarily
for WebAuthn Relying Parties that wish to tightly control the
experience around credential creation.
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
WebAuthn Extension Identifier: webauthn.aaguid
Description: This extension is added automatically by the
authenticator. This extension can be added to attestation
statements and signatures. A 128-bit Authenticator Attestation
GUID encoded as a CBOR text string (major type 3). This AAGUID is
used to identify the Authenticator model (Authenticator
Attestation GUID).
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
WebAuthn Extension Identifier: webauthn.exts
Description: The SupportedExtensions extension data is a list
(CBOR array) of extension identifiers encoded as UTF-8 Strings.
This extension is added automatically by the authenticator. This
extension can be added to attestation statements.
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
WebAuthn Extension Identifier: webauthn.uvi
Description: The user verification index (UVI) is a value uniquely
identifying a user verification data record. The UVI data can be
used by servers to understand whether an authentication was
authorized by the exact same biometric data as the initial key
generation. This allows the detection and prevention of "friendly
fraud".
Specification Document: [WebAuthn]
3. Security Considerations
[[there are likely some sec cons to discuss here. TBD]]
4. Change Log
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section before publication.
This is the initial -00 rev of this spec, hence no changes to log
here at this time.
5. Acknowledgements
Thanks to <fill-in here> for valuable comments and suggestions.
6. Normative References
[AndroidHWAttstn]
Google, "Android Hardware Attestation", Andorid Developers
Reference , 2016,
<https://developer.android.com/reference/android/
security/>.
[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2026>.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>.
[WebAuthn]
Bharadwaj, V., Le Van Gong, H., Balfanz, D., Czeskis, A.,
Birgisson, A., Hodges, J., Jones, M., and R. Lindemann,
"Web Authentication: An API for accessing Scoped
Credentials", World Wide Web Consortium FPWD, May 2016,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/>.
Author's Address
Jeff Hodges
PayPal
2211 North First Street
San Jose, California 95131
US
Email: Jeff.Hodges@PayPal.com
Received on Monday, 13 June 2016 18:30:50 UTC