W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > June 2016

[webauthn] Issue: clarify that at least one model of attestation must be employed marked as type:editorial

From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 23:36:15 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.labeled-158030340-None-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
equalsJeffH has just labeled an issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn as "type:editorial":

== clarify that at least one model of attestation must be employed ==
https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#iface-attestation says..
```
4.7. Credential Attestation Statement (interface WebAuthnAttestation)

Authenticators also provide some form of attestation. The basic 
requirement 
is that the authenticator can produce, for each credential public key,
 attestation 
information that can be verified by a WebAuthn Relying Party. 
```
It should perhaps be "..MUST also provide..", and have a link to the 
{#attestation-models} section.

See https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/115
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 23:36:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:21 UTC