W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [webauthn] Processing model for extensions is very underdefined

From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 00:25:45 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-269251428-1482798344-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

ES is "ecmaScript" I believe. also, #290 #295 are related to this one 
in that they address "extensions". 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/270#issuecomment-269251428 
using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2016 00:25:52 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: =JeffH via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Consider removing the "n" in "WebAuthnAttestation", etc"
Previous message: =JeffH via GitHub: "Closed: [webauthn] "If extensions was specified" should instead use the "present" terminology"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:24 UTC