public-webauthn@w3.org from August 2016 by date

Wednesday, 31 August 2016

• RE: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. Mandyam, Giridhar
• RE: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. Mike Jones
• Re: [webauthn] breakup IDL J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. gmandyam via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension gmandyam via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Token Binding ID: JWK -> opaque =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Token Binding ID: JWK -> opaque J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Allow caller to pick between strict and eTLD+1 matching balfanz via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 2b4d1f: Built by Travis-CI: a7817009bf82bd1ef3bca7d7c05ab3... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Allow caller to pick between strict and eTLD+1 matching J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a78170: Update index.bs with proposed location extension (... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 2d50c2: Built by Travis-CI: 62b67c02a37ab54ca8b3c1f7606bb7... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 62b67c: Cleaned up exposition of processing rules (#154) GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Client processing steps are not aligned with authenticator model Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Problem with authn selection extension Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Adding the User Verification Mode extension as per discussions in the… =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Fixed spelling, grammar, and document syntax issues =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] Should rpId be removed from clientData? =JeffH via GitHub

Tuesday, 30 August 2016

• [webauthn] should authenticator layer send hashed or unhashed rpId to authenticators? =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 00fe43: move IDL frags to applicable sections. fixes #112 ... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ee8715: fix xref GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] 4.1 heading should appear before the IDL =JeffH via GitHub
• 08/31/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension gmandyam via GitHub
• Call for Exclusions (Update): Web Authentication: A Web API for accessing scoped credentials Xueyuan Jia

Monday, 29 August 2016

• Closed: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary =JeffH via GitHub

Sunday, 28 August 2016

• work-in-progress: jeffh-editorial-cleanups Hodges, Jeff
• [w3c/webauthn] 80bb3f: clarify optionality of FIDO MDS. Fixes #47. GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub

Wednesday, 24 August 2016

• Re: Proposal for W3C-style Attestation Registry Wendy Seltzer
• RE: Proposal for W3C-style Attestation Registry Mandyam, Giridhar
• 08/24/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Cancelled Anthony Nadalin
• [webauthn] Privacy concerns with blacklist/whitelist Brad Hill via GitHub
• [webauthn] Spec draft points to wrong GitHub issues page Brad Hill via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules Alexei Czeskis via GitHub

Tuesday, 23 August 2016

• Proposal for W3C-style Attestation Registry Mandyam, Giridhar

Monday, 22 August 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Change Android SafetyNet attestation type identifier ? =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] clarify content of algorithm member of ScopedCredentialParameters =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Section 4.3: add reference to privacy =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Silent Authn? clarification of bit 0 in AuthenticatorData =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] clarify that at least one model of attestation must be employed =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] normalize RFC2119 language =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Relying Party or Server =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] do not entirely lose distinctions distinctions between External and Embedded Authenticators =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] do not totally lose the term "WebAuthn Relying Party" =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] do not totally lose the term "WebAuthn Relying Party" =JeffH via GitHub

Thursday, 18 August 2016

• Re: our cloud bikeshed? (was: issues with latest bikeshed J.C. Jones
• our cloud bikeshed? (was: issues with latest bikeshed Hodges, Jeff
• Re: issues with latest bikeshed J.C. Jones
• issues with latest bikeshed Hodges, Jeff
• Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD Mike West via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Secure context should be MUST not SHOULD Mike West via GitHub
• [webauthn] Define UTF-8 string Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [webauthn] lowercase form of this RP ID Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [webauthn] 4.1 heading should appear before the IDL Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] callerOrigin Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] callerOrigin =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] facet should be USVString =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Consider using USVString instead of DOMString sometimes =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] DOMString[] should be FrozenArray<DOMString> =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Problem with authn selection extension =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] clarify normality of authenticator model - is it actually authenticator API ? =JeffH via GitHub

Wednesday, 17 August 2016

• [webauthn] clarify normality of authenticator model - is it actually authenticator API ? =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: WebAuthn API Specification Review r12a
• Patent exclusions (Re: 08/17/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda) Wendy Seltzer
• Re: [webauthn] facet should be defined in terms of the HTML Standard Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [webauthn] facet should be USVString Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [webauthn] facet should be defined in terms of the HTML Standard Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [webauthn] "web origin of the script" Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [webauthn] What if callerOrigin is an opaque origin Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [webauthn] callerOrigin Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [webauthn] makeCredential() should use a dictionary Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 056c63: Address comments from @equalsJeffH GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Tuesday, 16 August 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] also cite the other extant TLS channel binding mechanisms? =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] also cite the other extant TLS channel binding mechanisms? =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] hostname canonicalization in {#makeCredential} section? =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] hostname canonicalization in {#makeCredential} section? =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Credential objects =JeffH via GitHub
• 08/17/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• [webauthn] Consider using USVString instead of DOMString sometimes Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• [webauthn] DOMString[] should be FrozenArray<DOMString> Domenic Denicola via GitHub

Monday, 15 August 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 615084: Token Binding ID: JWK -> opaque GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Friday, 12 August 2016

• Re: [webauthn] tokenBinding in ClientData should be a binary type (perhaps base64) and not JsonWebKey Andrei-Popov via GitHub
• [webauthn] tokenBinding in ClientData should be a binary type (perhaps base64) and not JsonWebKey Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] 98fb91: Allow caller to pick between strict and eTLD+1 mat... GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Make attestation more modular gmandyam via GitHub
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal v2 Vijay Bharadwaj
• AW: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal v2 Rolf Lindemann
• [w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 9c7d00: Fix typo (thanks Travis!) GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 966e41: Built by Travis-CI: 2b72ddfb805a4a0e2797afccea88cf... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede... GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Credential objects J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Make attestation more modular Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 212de8: Clean up attestation GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [webauthn] Clarify the definition of "origin" J.C. Jones via GitHub
• RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Hodges, Jeff
• RE: 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Vijay Bharadwaj

Tuesday, 9 August 2016

• 08/10/2016 W3C Web Authentication WG Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal v2 Ghosh, Rahuldeva

Monday, 8 August 2016

• [w3c/webauthn] d5b952: first draft of new proposal. See #156 GitHub
• Re: wrt deprecating eTLD+1 (was: Can we remove the PSL dependency?) Dirk Balfanz
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal Ghosh, Rahuldeva
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server - UVM extension proposal Ghosh, Rahuldeva
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

Sunday, 7 August 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI gmandyam via GitHub

Friday, 5 August 2016

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• RE: Spec status Mandyam, Giridhar

Thursday, 4 August 2016

• RE: Spec status Vijay Bharadwaj
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c79e21: IDL cleanup: don't require callers to create Crede... GitHub
• Spec status Vijay Bharadwaj
• [w3c/webauthn] 066351: TravisCI Fix: Don't update gh-pages for non-master... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Update index.bs with proposed location extension gmandyam via GitHub

Wednesday, 3 August 2016

• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Ghosh, Rahuldeva
• RE: 10 August: 90 minute meeting Anthony Nadalin
• Re: 10 August: 90 minute meeting Dirk Balfanz
• 10 August: 90 minute meeting Samuel Weiler
• [webauthn] Clarify meaning of UVI Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Vijay Bharadwaj
• Re: [webauthn] Cleaned up exposition of processing rules =JeffH via GitHub
• RE: Proposal for a Location Extension, rev 4 Vijay Bharadwaj
• RE: 08/03/2106 W3C WebAuthentication WG Agenda Vijay Bharadwaj

Tuesday, 2 August 2016

• 08/03/2106 W3C WebAuthentication WG Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• RE: draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-00 jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Proposal for a Location Extension, rev 4 Mandyam, Giridhar
• Re: wrt deprecating eTLD+1 (was: Can we remove the PSL dependency?) Richard Barnes
• Re: Can we remove the PSL dependency? jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
• Re: wrt deprecating eTLD+1 (was: Can we remove the PSL dependency?) jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com

Monday, 1 August 2016

• RE: returning a multi-factor authenticator's factor-in-use and protection scheme to the server Anthony Nadalin

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2016 20:47:22 UTC