- From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:00:10 +0000
- To: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>, "Hodges, Jeff" <jeff.hodges@paypal.com>
- CC: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SN1PR0301MB16453D7A06E2FA025C644453F5630@SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.>
Thanks, Vijay. From: Vijay Bharadwaj [mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 2:35 PM To: Hodges, Jeff <jeff.hodges@paypal.com> Cc: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org> Subject: RE: Markdown cleanup Hearing no objections, I have now merged this. From: Hodges, Jeff [mailto:jeff.hodges@paypal.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:18 AM To: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>> Cc: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org<mailto:public-webauthn@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Markdown cleanup On 4/26/16, 11:15 AM, "Vijay Bharadwaj" <vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>> wrote: Any objections from the group to merging this? Otherwise I'll merge this afternoon, so we can keep things moving. Thanks! please merge ! From: Hodges, Jeff [mailto:jeff.hodges@paypal.com] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 3:57 PM To: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>> Cc: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org<mailto:public-webauthn@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Markdown cleanup +10K it seems you're now a bikeshed/markdown expert :) I say `merge` ;-) --- On 4/22/16, 3:44 PM, "Mike Jones" <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>> wrote: Thanks for doing this so quickly, Vijay! From: Vijay Bharadwaj [mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 2:42 PM To: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org<mailto:public-webauthn@w3.org>> Subject: Markdown cleanup Hi, As promised, I went through the spec and cleaned up the markdown. The resulting HTML (copy attached in case you don't have Bikeshed) is hopefully indistinguishable from the previous version - let me know if you notice any issues. The new Bikeshed source (which you can find in Github) is now at least stylistically consistent (whether it's prettier is of course a matter of opinion, though I think it is). Please let me know if you find any issues. As mentioned earlier, I would like to merge this in quickly if possible so that Mike and Jeff can do their editorial passes and not have to deal with monster merge conflicts. Thanks, -- -Vijay
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 22:00:42 UTC