Re: Markdown cleanup

On 4/26/16, 11:15 AM, "Vijay Bharadwaj" <vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>> wrote:

Any objections from the group to merging this? Otherwise I'll merge this afternoon, so we can keep things moving. Thanks!

please merge !



From: Hodges, Jeff [mailto:jeff.hodges@paypal.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 3:57 PM
To: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>>
Cc: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org<mailto:public-webauthn@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Markdown cleanup

+10K

it seems you're now a bikeshed/markdown expert :)

I say `merge`   ;-)

---
On 4/22/16, 3:44 PM, "Mike Jones" <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>> wrote:

Thanks for doing this so quickly, Vijay!

From: Vijay Bharadwaj [mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 2:42 PM
To: W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org<mailto:public-webauthn@w3.org>>
Subject: Markdown cleanup

Hi,

As promised, I went through the spec and cleaned up the markdown. The resulting HTML (copy attached in case you don't have Bikeshed) is hopefully indistinguishable from the previous version - let me know if you notice any issues. The new Bikeshed source (which you can find in Github) is now at least stylistically consistent (whether it's prettier is of course a matter of opinion, though I think it is).

Please let me know if you find any issues. As mentioned earlier, I would like to merge this in quickly if possible so that Mike and Jeff can do their editorial passes and not have to deal with monster merge conflicts.

Thanks,

--
-Vijay