- From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 17:25:05 -0400
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>, W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
On 04/12/2016 01:14 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > Note from last time we at W3C still need to discuss with Wendy (who was > out last week) the status of attestation/signature formats. So, let's go > through the rest of the issues and return to that particular issue next > week. While I missed last week's meeting, I see that there was some discussion of the multiple spec components and how they do or don't fit together in W3C. Here's my thinking: W3C Members chartered the WG with three deliverables[1], based on the FIDO 2.0 submission, for Web Authentication API, Attestations, and Signature Format. These can be provided in one or multiple documents, as makes most sense to editors, implementors, developers, and users, but together, they benefit from the W3C's royalty-free patent policy and make up a suite of specs needed to specify interoperable strong authentication for the Web. If the group thinks it makes sense to split them back into separate documents, that's fine; we can even consider distinct teleconferences to focus on them separately, making sure that we have the right expertise for each component. I would not support dropping any of the pieces of chartered work at this stage. Thanks, --Wendy [1] https://www.w3.org/Webauthn/charter/#deliverables > On 04/12/2016 11:24 AM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: >> >> 1. Roll Call >> >> 2. Agenda Bashing >> >> 3. Open Issue status for FPWD >> >> a. Glossary/Terms Discussion >> >> 4. Walk Open Issues List >> >> 5. A.O.B. >> >> 6. Adjourn >> > > -- Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) https://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 21:25:09 UTC