- From: Tim Cappalli <Tim.Cappalli@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:48:41 +0000
- To: Maud Nalpas <maudn@google.com>, Matthew Miller <matthew@millerti.me>
- CC: public-webauthn-adoption <public-webauthn-adoption@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SJ0PR00MB11415261AA5B50C404C03C9495B4A@SJ0PR00MB1141.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
RE: libraries, the two biggest criteria I have is that they're spec conformant and updated for passkeys (meaning they offer the new functionality that came with passkeys and also follow best practices). I think the first step would be documenting the desired criteria, gaining consensus on that criteria, and then ensuring we have a few people on the hook to validate submissions (which can be via a GH issue template when the time comes). Tim From: Maud Nalpas <maudn@google.com> Date: Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:45 To: Matthew Miller <matthew@millerti.me> Cc: public-webauthn-adoption <public-webauthn-adoption@w3.org> Subject: Re: Call for Topics for WACG meeting @ 11/20 9:00am PT Hi folks, I'm travelling for work today so will likely only be able to listen in, but I'd like to suggest two items for discussion (can also be covered at the next meeting if that's easier). * At the moment, an inventory of webauthn/passkey libraries (SimpleWebAuthn and the like) is available on passkeys.dev<http://passkeys.dev/> here<https://passkeys.dev/docs/tools-libraries/libraries/>. It's a great resource, and I was wondering how we can make it even more useful to developers. Some questions around this theme: What's the process for adding libraries to that list? Should we encourage lib maintainers to open PRs against passkeys.dev<http://passkeys.dev/> to reference their libraries - or maybe make a special issue template to make that easy? Should we reference more of the libraries listed on awesome-webauthn<https://github.com/herrjemand/awesome-webauthn>? What are some acceptance criteria this group thinks a library should meet to be referenced on passkeys-dev (e.g. FIDO conformance?) What other aspects of a library can be surfaced on passkeys.dev<http://passkeys.dev/> to help developers make a choice? Etc. * By the way, does this group think it's in the scope of our work to help libraries pass conformance? Note: I also added a few ideas to the frameworks<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nHjgFEx30RNaG3fstyAm2bihuckB3MO927-yjJ1NdKM/edit?pli=1#gid=0> doc you started, @Matthew. Looking forward to continuing the discussion on this, and on the items above. Thanks! - Maud On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 6:06 PM Matthew Miller <matthew@millerti.me<mailto:matthew@millerti.me>> wrote: Hello everyone, The next WACG meeting is next Monday @ 11/20 9:00am PT. If there's anything you would like to add to the agenda just Reply to this email with your topic and we'll make sure it's prioritized for discussion. See you all next week, -Matthew
Received on Monday, 20 November 2023 15:48:54 UTC